Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Weathering the Storm


April 16, 2002 By

The events of Sept. 11 have pushed evacuation planning to the forefront for all levels of government. Among the scenarios being studied are improved ways of evacuating large areas in the event of a catastrophe. Evacuation models for various regions and potential types of disaster are available, and, not surprisingly, GIS plays a key role in the most current of these. In particular, the South Carolina Department of Transportation has implemented a real-time decision-support program for evacuation and has put it to the test under actual conditions.

On Sept. 22, 1989, Hurricane Hugo hit the coast of South Carolina and left a path of death and destruction that penetrated deep inland. That triggered a series of events that led to an operational decision support system by 1999. In that year, Hurricane Dennis provided a dress rehearsal, allowing the state to test features of the system before the hurricane finally skirted the South Carolina coast and skipped away without incident. It was three weeks later, when Hurricane Floyd began to churn the waters of the Mid-Atlantic, that the real test came.

With winds building to a Category 5 storm, Floyd rolled ominously toward the southeastern coastline and South Carolina state officials launched what has been called the largest peacetime evacuation in U.S. history. From Beaufort to Myrtle Beach, more than 700,000 people streamed onto the highways to escape inland. As emergency personnel along the 150-mile coastline began the evacuation for what might have been the worst natural disaster in the state's history, they worked with up-to-the minute detailed information provided by South Carolina's Department of Transportation (DOT).

In the end, Floyd fell flat, blowing itself out at sea and making an innocuous landfall. But the system worked. Those who had to leave the coastal areas got out in time. Of equal importance, the data made available by the experience provided a solid basis for evaluation and refinements that would make the next evacuation go even more smoothly.

Integrating Existing Data Sets

"The system basically integrates and displays up-to-date weather data with real-time traffic data taken from sophisticated induction strips that are built into the pavement," said Rob Mott, senior technical manager with Intergraph, which assisted the state in developing the GIS components of the evacuation system. "These air-pressure tubes record traffic counts and are in place at more than 150 locations. This system was already in place, so it was ideal for collecting data in connection with the hurricane evacuation system."

According to Mott, the evacuation support system makes traffic counts available via the Web to the operators at the DOT. Using historical information about traffic flow and road capacity, these operators can assess how an evacuation is proceeding. They can also determine how much time is left before the storm makes landfall and locate the most critical areas of potential threat. Using this information, other state officials can implement a variety of strategies designed to minimize traffic jams and speed the evacuation process.

For example, traffic can be rerouted to avoid tie-ups or bad road conditions. Additionally, traffic lanes can be reversed, so lanes that would normally be used to go toward the coast can be opened up to double traffic capacity away from the coast.

The real time weather data is presented in pictorial form. It is not dynamic, but rather a snapshot that shows coastlines, highways and terrain features. Because hurricanes come in with a very distinct cloud formation, it is easy to see where the front is, and that pictorial information is useful in giving perspective to the traffic data.

Simplified Information Distribution

To combine and distribute digital information over the Web, South Carolina's DOT is using GeoMedia Web Map, a Windows-based software suite that accepts and publishes multiple data sources over a network. Maps can be displayed and


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All