Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Arizona Unifies Courts on One Document System



April 12, 2010 By

Local court systems across the country have been digitizing legal filings for the past few years to reduce paper management cut costs. Typically, however, each court deploys its own electronic document system, and it often doesn't connect to the systems of the other courts in the state.

Things will work differently in Arizona when the Arizona Supreme Court (ASC) connects all the state's ctourt document systems. The forthcoming system will let a citizen who's filing a document at any courthouse to retrieve all relevant case material from other courts in the same transaction.

The project required all county courthouses to host electronic documents with sufficient redundancy in case of a disaster. That was something only two counties in the state could do, according to Karl Heckart, CIO of the ASC. Fortunately those two counties -- Maricopa County and Pima County -- represented most of the state's population and held the majority of Arizona's local tax revenue. That meant they could afford robust backup systems, while the other counties could not afford such technology.

Using software called OnBase 9.2 from Hyland Software, the ASC is creating a central data repository for hosting court documents for the smaller counties. Simultaneously the software will let Maricopa County and Pima County continue hosting their own documents and route end-users from other courts to those documents. Keeping Maricopa and Pima counties' court documents hosted locally will save the ASC a lot of money, Heckart explained.

"Maricopa County itself accounts for 60 percent of the court filings. That's 60 percent of the documents I don't have to transfer and store at a central repository," Heckart said.

The project cost $2 million, which the ASC expects to recover from the fees citizens pay for using the system. Heckart said getting the various local document management systems to interface with OnBase 9.2 was easy because all of those individual systems were made by Hyland.

Heckart said that at a time when Arizona agencies have laid off staff in droves, the system will enable all of the state's courts to manage documents with fewer employees.

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All