Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Arkansas Counties Turn to Technology to Combat Meth Production



April 6, 2007 By

Three Arkansas counties have joined forces to put Meth labs out of business by cracking down on the excessive purchase of pseudoephedrine (PSE), the key precursor ingredient in the production of Methamphetamine. Sheriffs' departments and pharmacies in Cross, Poinsett and Craighead counties are using an innovative web-based application called MethCheck, created by Appriss Inc.

MethCheck replaces manual log books with a single nationwide electronic database and allows pharmacies to submit purchase transactions to law enforcement agencies. This technology gives investigators the tools to identify a shopper who moves from store to store, or even state to state, to avoid suspicion -- a technique commonly known as "smurfing."

More than 6,000 pharmacies in 43 states are currently in the implementation process, according to Appriss in a release. In addition to Arkansas, law enforcement agencies and pharmacies in Kentucky, Oklahoma and West Virginia are using MethCheck. With 23 bills in 15 states calling for tightening PSE laws or requiring electronic monitoring, a number of other states are expected to move on the application in 2007.

Laws regulating the purchase of PSE differ from state to state, creating a compliance challenge for pharmacies and other retailers operating throughout the country. In addition, pharmacies must comply with the Combat Meth Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), which limits the purchase of medicines containing PSE to 9 grams per 30-day period or 3.6 grams in a single day. The CMEA also requires that tablets containing PSE must be kept in a secure location. Purchasers are required to provide photo identification as well as their name, address, date of birth and signature to obtain the tablets.

The aggressive approach to busting Meth labs is critical because the highly addictive drug hooks users after just a few uses. Also, Meth labs are toxic to the environment and dangerous because of the volatility and flammability of many of the key ingredients. In addition, Meth is commonly associated with identity theft, assault, child abuse, sex crimes and domestic violence due to the effects on its users.

MethCheck helps pharmacies comply with state and federal law while at the same time allowing law enforcement officers to identify suspicious buying patterns and individuals who exceed the legal purchase limits for PSE. "MethCheck gives us a more efficient surveillance tool for locating people who are cooking and selling Meth. The pharmacies also like the system, because it eases the burden of paper registries," said Cross County, Arkansas Sheriff Ronnie Baldwin. "This is truly a nationwide solution, and it's the only way to tackle the Meth problem because these offenders rarely respect county or state borders."

The system has already proven successful in shutting down Meth labs. In November 2005, the Kentucky Office of Drug Control Policy began piloting use of MethCheck at 15 pharmacies in Laurel County through the Operation UNITE (Unlawful Narcotics Investigations Treatment and Education) Drug Task Force in Eastern Kentucky. In the year since the pilot began, Operation UNITE has charged 22 people who purchased more than the legal limit of PSE. Of these, 16 were charged with manufacturing methamphetamine. The program has also helped locate purchases made by 26 people involved in a methamphetamine manufacturing conspiracy case.

"I use MethCheck on a daily basis to run suspicious buyer reports and purchase limit reports," said Officer Brian Lewis. "Prior to using this system I would spend almost a full day traveling to all the participating pharmacies and making copies of manual logs before returning to my office to look at the data. A process that took two days now takes only a couple of minutes."

Staff from participating pharmacies also said they found MethCheck to be far quicker, simpler, and more accurate than the manual log they were maintaining prior to using MethCheck.


| More

You May Also Like

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All