February 26, 2013 By Daniel C. Vock
When it comes to red-light cameras, New Jersey Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon says the people in his state have had enough. Nothing, he says, has generated more feedback in his five years as a legislator than his fight against the cameras.
“People realize the government is institutionalizing a system to rip them off,” says O’Scanlon, a Republican. The public is upset and problems in New Jersey led to a brief suspension of its traffic cameras last summer.
Where Are the Red-Light Cameras?There are 543 communities in the United States that use red-light cameras. More than half of them are located in just four states. This list shows states with the highest number of communities using red-light cameras.
|
The outcry goes far beyond New Jersey. Traffic cameras spark heated debate nearly everywhere they are considered, and they are on legislative agendas throughout the country. This year, lawmakers in 22 states have filed more than 100 bills dealing with traffic cameras, says Anne Teigen, a senior policy specialist with the National Conference of State Legislatures.
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.
Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.
Red light cameras are on the way out, it will just take some more time. The revenue nature of the cameras and the unfairness of the traffic light engineering to make them profitable is becoming well known. Once citizens understand the predatory revenue purpose for the cameras, they almost always become opponents. The opponents win most of the time - it just takes patience and a LOT of safe drivers to be punished unfairly before the cameras are removed. The entire industry is corrupt and immoral and it will end. James C. Walker, National Motorists Association
Please, predatory revenue purpose? It is far more expensive to station traffic enforcement police at four legs of an intersection for several hours each day much less 24/7 to serve exactly the same purpose, that is, address the death and injury toll created by those who run red lights. Red light cameras deal with those who reckessly endanger others, and the cost of tickets is chicken feed compared to the cost of loss of life, lifetime injury, etc. End of story.