Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Behind the Scenes


October 11, 2005 By

A tree falls in the park down the street from your house. You call the city parks department, a neighbor calls the city public works department and another neighbor leaves a message with a city councilmember. Several days later, a parks maintenance vehicle, a city public works truck and a contract landscaper show up simultaneously to remove the fallen tree.

Two important functions of a 311 call system -- whether it be a city or county system -- are streamlining public reporting processes and helping eliminate such costly redundancies.

Baltimore deployed the nation's first 311 call center in 1996, and the FCC approved it for nationwide use in 1997. Since then, a few dozen jurisdictions have begun using 311 public information and reporting systems, including Houston, Minneapolis and New York City.

Expectation and Innovation

The jurisdictions using 311 systems have devised new and different innovations to satisfy call center demands unique to their constituents' needs.

When initiating New York City's 311 system, Mayor Michael Bloomberg mandated that 85 percent of all incoming calls be answered within 10 seconds. The promise of a live person answering the phone, coupled with the 175 or so languages spoken in New York City, resulted in the need for innovative solutions to help keep the mayor's promise.

New York City currently keeps a number of multilingual operators for the most common languages, and uses a third-party, live-translation service to help meet the needs of city residents who speak less common languages.

If an operator determines that they need language assistance on an incoming call, the third-party system is activated and a translator comes on the line and translates for the call in real-time.

In other cities such as Chicago, Caller ID is used to aid in call routing through automation.

"If we received a call from a phone number about a pot hole, and then have another call two days later coming from the same number, there is a good chance it's about that pothole again," Joe Geiser, Government Solutions Executive for Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories explained. "So the system will try to forward the call to a specialist on potholes or public works."

Increasing Efficiency

Along with caller ID and caller ID history analytics, call centers use a number of customer relationship management (CRM) systems -- offered by companies such as Oracle, PeopleSoft and Siebel -- to track a wide variety of internal metrics used to increase efficiency and public satisfaction. The internal systems keep track of things such as the total time each operator spends on specific types of calls and the number of calls received about the same issue.

Call tracking systems also help administrators track seasonal trends, so call centers can prepare for high-volume periods.

"The hardest part of running a 311 call center is learning to anticipate the unexpected," Geiser observed.

CRM and call tracking systems also offer a way to monitor operator performance. For example, if most operators can handle a call reporting a pothole within 30 seconds, and one operator is averaging 2 minutes, then the call center managers know they need to offer better training to bring that operator up to speed.

A number of cities utilize a multi-tiered approach to handling a number of the more complex calls.

Dean Schloyer, executive director of New York's 311 system explains that New York uses a multi-tiered system of generalists and specialists. While all operators are trained as general operators and can manage the gambit of normal incoming calls, they also maintain a number of specialists that are proficient in the more technical issues that can arise with public works issues.

Houston's 311 system, on the other hand, has worked to train operators to handle any type of call that they may receive.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All