Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Bond Tracking Tool Helps Citizens Follow Funding


Money Trail
Money Trail

January 18, 2009 By

Think of all the bonds for transportation, parks, universities and other government projects the states pass each election year. They always involve "drop in the bucket" tax increases and promise dazzling community enhancements. Do citizens really give these bonds another thought after voting for them? Most people lack time to navigate government bureaucracies. So California implemented its Bond Accountability Database in 2007, a GIS-based Web tool for citizens to track where the money goes from passed bonds and the status of the resulting projects.

"You can see whether the project is on time, on budget and within scope," said Bryan Cash, deputy assistant secretary for Bonds and Grants of the California Resources Agency.

The database - www.bondaccountability.ca.gov -came by an executive order from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

"It's our responsibility to hold up our end of the bargain by being able to demonstrate to the people that we are spending the money they entrusted us to spend wisely," said H.D. Palmer, deputy director of External Affairs for the California Department of Finance (DoF).

 

Readable Descriptions

Many know the frustration of using Web tools supposedly designed to keep governments transparent, but instead deliver information in dense, jargon-filled language. The DoF wanted to avoid that, by instructing all participating agencies to submit project status descriptions with easily readable text.

"We don't want people to have to be experts in the different program areas to understand the information on the Web site," said John Ellison, agency information officer of the California Resources Agency.

Agencies divide those project descriptions into three sections. The "front end" identifies the agency running the project, and its plan to execute the project, including metrics and the amount of money being spent.

The "middle" section is where citizens should check routinely because it offers status reports on projects - where the money has gone and what's on time or late. The "back-end" section reports audit results on how efficiently projects were completed and whether inappropriate spending occurred.

 

Behind the Scene

California's bond accountability Web tool is actually several Web sites linked together, sharing the graphic motif of the governor's site. The DoF hosts the first few pages. Once users search for a bond, a hyperlink takes them to the bond accountability Web page of the agency spending that bond money.

"Trying to design a system where one agency housed all of the data and all of the other departments fed into it, was something that would cost more than we could have done with our existing resources and short time frame," said Theresa Gunn, principal program budget analyst of the DoF.

 

Creative Saving

The Resources Agency saved money and time by pairing its existing GIS team with a Microsoft SQL database operated by the state's Department of Parks and Recreation, a.k.a. "California State Parks." All people reporting on bond projects in both agencies submit their information to the California State Parks database.

The GIS team in the Resources Agency then accesses the database and translates the information into GIS data. This lets citizens narrow their queries bond to projects affecting areas where they live.

"We're also developing an advanced query so you can ask, not only by location - say you're interested in all projects in a specific county costing more than $50,000 and less than $1 million," Ellison said. "The general public might not be interested in that, but different interest groups might like to understand where those dollars are going and affecting their particular areas of interest."

The California State Parks database features a Web application allowing anyone submitting data


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All