Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

California DMV Poised to Launch Collaboration with Counties


January 4, 2010 By

A bureaucratic process between California counties and the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will soon be history, thanks to collaboration between the DMV and Kevin Dickey, deputy CIO and chief information security officer of Contra Costa County, Calif.

For years, the DMV has required the numerous business units within all the counties to fill out a thick application for continuing their data access arrangements with the DMV. Completing the applications has been a nuisance for county CIOs because they have to help each business unit with the technology aspects of the application every time a business unit needs to complete one.

"We have 17 different business units in my county that DMV sends a separate package to," Dickey said.

DMV staff found administrating all of those packages equally burdensome, according to Paulette Johnson, chief information security officer for the California DMV.

Different county units get the packages at different times of the year, meaning Dickey and other county CIOs have to go through the process several times annually. Getting the completed applications approved by the DMV is another headache, according to Dickey.

"After heading over to the DMV, the package goes through a minimum of four different business units over there. If any one of those business units doesn't like the way I crossed a 't' or dotted an 'i,' they can reject it and send it back," Dickey said.

Pilot Going Well

In early 2009, Dickey got permission from all California county CIOs to meet with the DMV on their behalf and propose a solution. As a pilot project, Dickey suggested the DMV create one application package designed for gathering all of the necessary data at once from all of the county's business units. Since county IT departments had to have a hand in every business unit's application, Dickey suggested county IT departments facilitate completion of the applications. An IT official can supply all IT-related information for all the business units at once and instruct the business units on what they need to contribute. Then the IT official will submit the package to the DMV for approval.

"We're going to save the DMV soft- and hard-dollar costs significantly, as well as all the counties," Dickey remarked, pointing to the extra processing work that would vanish for both counties and the DMV.

DMV officials were elated because the idea aligned with the data security agenda they were already establishing. "This aligns with the DMV's goals of increasing the security of its information," Johnson said.

Coincidentally, in 2009, the DMV had already implemented a similar consolidation to the security request packages it sent to the California Department of Child Support Services.

Dickey got the backing of all of the state's county CIOs by circulating an e-mail pitching his idea. He was viewed as uniquely suited for the job because of his prior career in state government.

"With my 22 years of prior state service, I knew how the bureaucracy worked, and I knew whom to contact," Dickey said.

The DMV assembled the numerous employees responsible for sending packages to agencies and created a single package that would cover all necessary data. Part of this process required establishing the amount of time needed to create a package, based on the number of county agencies that needed to provide information for it.

Johnson said the pilot attempt at this project with Contra Costa County is going well, and the DMV would announce its intent to move forward with other counties near the end of January.

"We're good to go now. As a matter of fact, we're meeting with the counties later on this month and announcing this," Johnson reported, later adding, "We can't have all 58 counties come do it at once. We're going to have to stagger the workload."


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All