IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

California Unveils Details On Top-to-Bottom Review of State's Voting Systems

"Right now, far too many voters are wondering about the accuracy of California's election results."

California Secretary of State Debra Bowen yesterday unveiled the project plan that will be used to conduct a promised top-to-bottom review of the voting systems certified for use in California.

"California voters are entitled to have their votes counted exactly as they were cast," said Secretary Bowen, the state's chief elections officer. "This top-to-bottom review is designed with one goal in mind: to ensure that California's voters cast their ballots on voting systems that are secure, accurate, reliable, and accessible."

The Secretary of State is entering into an interagency agreement with the University of California to conduct the review -- the first of its kind in the nation according to a release from Bowen's office -- that is scheduled to begin the week of May 14 and conclude in late July. UC will assemble three top-to-bottom review teams, drawing specialists from throughout the university system, as well as from public and private universities and private sector companies throughout the country. Each team will consist of approximately seven people and will conduct a review of documents and studies associated with each voting system, a review of the computer source code each machine relies on, and a red team penetration attack to see if the system's security can be compromised.
 
"My goal is to get California to a place where voters, elections officials, candidates, and activists have confidence in the results of every election," continued Bowen. "This kind of a comprehensive review is essential in getting us to that point. One of three things will happen to each voting system that's being reviewed. The first possibility is that a system will be found to be secure, accurate, reliable and accessible as it stands, so voters can have confidence when they use it on Election Day. Second, a system may be required to use additional safeguards, such as an expanded post-election audit process. The third possibility is that a voting system can't be made secure, accurate, reliable and accessible even with additional safeguards, so that system may be decertified, which means it could not be used for any election in 2008."

Details on the project plan, the people who will be conducting the review, and other information can be found online.

"One of the concerns people had with the draft criteria was that the vendors would be held to a new set of standards that would be impossible for them to meet by February 2008," continued Bowen. "This final project plan makes it clear that the top-to-bottom review is going to determine whether the voting systems certified for use in California comply with existing state and federal laws that require them to be secure, accurate, reliable and accessible."

In March, Bowen issued draft criteria and gathered public comments on her proposal. Those comments -- over 125 in all -- are posted on the Secretary of State's Web site. The Secretary of State welcomes further comments from the public about the review while it's underway and she will continue to provide updates on the Web site. Comments may be submitted to the Secretary of State's Office by e-mail to votingsystems@sos.ca.gov or by mail to Secretary Debra Bowen, 1500 11th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, ATTN: Voting Systems Review, 6th Floor.

"Democracy, by definition, is about free, fair and open elections," concluded Bowen. "My goal is to have election results that are beyond question or doubt. Right now, far too many voters are wondering about the accuracy of California's election results. We have three statewide elections next year, which makes it even more essential that our voting equipment be secure, accurate, reliable and accessible."