Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Commentary: Jurisdictions Seek to Profit from Bad Habits


April 8, 2009 By

A pack of cigarettes in New York City brings in $2.75 state excise tax, $1.50 city excise tax , $1.01 in federal excise tax, with an 8.375% sales tax. So a pack of cigarettes costs about $10 in the city, about $95 per carton with taxes and fees. But the same carton sells for only $41 on the Internet. According to New York Congressman Anthony D. Weiner, Internet sales of cigarettes cost the city of New York up to $150 million in tax revenue. To plug this loophole, Weiner says that Congress is going to consider legislation to make it illegal to mail cigarettes. Meanwhile cigarette companies are forced to fund anti-smoking ads.

In California, state Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco has sponsored a bill to legalize marijuana growth, possession and sale. The bill would also ban local and state authorities from enforcing federal drug laws related to marijuana. A state tax of $50 per ounce would be levied, which according to some published accounts would produce over a billion dollars per year in new revenues, some of which would go toward "drug abuse prevention." And on the other side of the ledger, law enforcement could stop enforcing marijuana laws leaving it free to enforce other things.

And then of course, government agencies running lotteries are attempting to protect "their" gambling from Internet gaming, claiming that it cuts into "the people's revenues," some of which go to fund "gambling addiction" programs.

Government seems to think it can profit from the poison while throwing coins at some supposed antidote. It is jumping into profitable ventures and legislating against "the competition." And to that extent, it is failing to carry out its duties to protect and serve society and the public. Government entangled in "sin-tax" revenues may lose sight of the mission in pursuit of the gold.


| More

Comments

alice    |    Commented April 9, 2009

Government bewails the addictions, but then invests in them in other ways. He mentions cigarettes, marijuana, and gaming; there's been talk of legalizing prostitution, too. What's next - heroin, as long as we pay a high enough tax for it?

alice    |    Commented April 9, 2009

Government bewails the addictions, but then invests in them in other ways. He mentions cigarettes, marijuana, and gaming; there's been talk of legalizing prostitution, too. What's next - heroin, as long as we pay a high enough tax for it?

alice    |    Commented April 9, 2009

Government bewails the addictions, but then invests in them in other ways. He mentions cigarettes, marijuana, and gaming; there's been talk of legalizing prostitution, too. What's next - heroin, as long as we pay a high enough tax for it?


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All