Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Data Gaps Could Hinder a Nationwide Traffic Information System, GAO Study Finds



December 7, 2009 By

Although federal, state and local agencies in the public and private sectors are operating smart traffic systems to help travelers combat traffic congestion, there are still gaps in coverage and quality of data collection that could hinder the creation of a connected nationwide system, according to a recently released federal report.

In a Nov. 30 report titled Efforts to Address Highway Congestion through Real-Time Traffic Information Systems Are Expanding but Face Implementation Challenges from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), most transportation experts who were interviewed by the GAO agreed that a nationwide real-time traffic information system is needed to help address gaps in information coverage and inconsistencies in data quality. State and local transportation departments also are facing limitations in data collection.

"The cost of deploying and maintaining technologies that collect traffic data, such as fixed sensors, is a major factor limiting the roadway mileage public agencies can cover," said the report. This also means that highways get first priority when it comes to data collection, leaving arterial and rural roads with significantly less coverage.

According to the report, a majority of states have operational 511 traveler information systems or plan to make them operational by 2010. However, states such as Texas and Michigan don't have a 511 system in place, nor do they have plans to implement such a program. This may be due to a lack in traffic data and proper funding, and it creates a gap in a potential nationwide system.

State and local governments are bridging these gaps in a variety of ways, including partnering with the private sector. "For example, the Alabama DOT [Department of Transportation] purchases real-time traffic information from INRIX," said a GAO analyst in an interview with Government Technology.

"INRIX uses newer technologies that state and local governments don't typically use, such as vehicle probes," she said about the vendor. "Also, one of the benefits of partnering with the private sector is that the technologies they use are able to collect more data on arterial roads, which can be difficult because of so many cars stopping periodically and entering and exiting the roads." Sometimes purchasing traffic information from the private sector can be more cost-effective than paying for a government fleet to do the same job.

Others states are finding that partnering with neighboring states can be beneficial for sharing and disseminating traffic information. "There is a group of eight states called the Northwest Passage Corridor Coalition around Wisconsin and Minnesota, and they coordinate on the dissemination of real-time traffic information," said the analyst.

According to the GAO, the Federal Highway Administration will soon release requirements for states that would make traffic information available and set standards for data quality and timeliness. The proposed rule establishes minimum data quality requirements. Specifically, the rule establishes minimum requirements for timeliness, availability and accuracy. But local municipalities fear that lack of time and not enough funding will cause them to fall short of federal deadlines.

"State and local officials told the GAO that the proposed time frames to develop the program are too short and would be difficult to implement without additional funds," said the report. "DOT expects to issue the final rule in February 2010 and is currently considering options to address such concerns."

The Federal Highway Administration would help states fund intelligent transportation system projects using the Highway Trust Fund, and states would then have to adhere to the agency's requirements.

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All