Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

E-Vote: California Secretary of State Debra Bowen Releases Draft Criteria for Voting Machine Review



March 26, 2007 By

The Vote: California Secretary of State Debra Bowen Releases Draft Criteria for Top-to-Bottom Voting Machine Review

Secretary of State Debra Bowen yesterday unveiled her proposed draft criteria that will be used to conduct a thorough top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California.

"The review is designed to restore people's confidence in the integrity of our electoral process," said Secretary Bowen, the state's chief elections officer. "Every California voter has the right to have their vote counted as it was cast. This first-of-its-kind top-to-bottom review is designed to ensure that California voters are being asked to cast their ballots on machines that are secure, accurate, accessible, and auditable."

The draft criteria covers system security issues, access for voters with disabilities, access for minority language voters, and usability for elections officials and poll workers in a variety of situations.

Public comments are being accepted by Bowen, and once those comments are compiled and the draft criteria are finalized, Bowen will begin a thorough examination of all voting systems currently certified for use in California elections. The review itself will be conducted publicly, though laws regarding confidentiality and proprietary software will restrict access to certain aspects of the review.

Manufacturers with voting systems certified for use in California elections include DFM Associates, Diebold Election Systems, Election Systems & Software, HART Intercivic, and Sequoia Voting Systems.

"I want input from as many people as possible -- voting rights activists, county elections officials, and anyone else who wants to offer an opinion -- to craft the final criteria that will be used to conduct a thorough and timely review of the voting systems used in California," continued Bowen.

After reviewing the public comments on the draft criteria, Secretary Bowen plans to finalize the criteria by April 6, and will issue a proposed review and public hearing schedule shortly thereafter.


| More

Comments

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All