Government Technology

E-Vote: California Secretary of State Debra Bowen Releases Draft Criteria for Voting Machine Review



March 26, 2007 By

The Vote: California Secretary of State Debra Bowen Releases Draft Criteria for Top-to-Bottom Voting Machine Review

Secretary of State Debra Bowen yesterday unveiled her proposed draft criteria that will be used to conduct a thorough top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California.

"The review is designed to restore people's confidence in the integrity of our electoral process," said Secretary Bowen, the state's chief elections officer. "Every California voter has the right to have their vote counted as it was cast. This first-of-its-kind top-to-bottom review is designed to ensure that California voters are being asked to cast their ballots on machines that are secure, accurate, accessible, and auditable."

The draft criteria covers system security issues, access for voters with disabilities, access for minority language voters, and usability for elections officials and poll workers in a variety of situations.

Public comments are being accepted by Bowen, and once those comments are compiled and the draft criteria are finalized, Bowen will begin a thorough examination of all voting systems currently certified for use in California elections. The review itself will be conducted publicly, though laws regarding confidentiality and proprietary software will restrict access to certain aspects of the review.

Manufacturers with voting systems certified for use in California elections include DFM Associates, Diebold Election Systems, Election Systems & Software, HART Intercivic, and Sequoia Voting Systems.

"I want input from as many people as possible -- voting rights activists, county elections officials, and anyone else who wants to offer an opinion -- to craft the final criteria that will be used to conduct a thorough and timely review of the voting systems used in California," continued Bowen.

After reviewing the public comments on the draft criteria, Secretary Bowen plans to finalize the criteria by April 6, and will issue a proposed review and public hearing schedule shortly thereafter.


| More

Comments

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

Anonymous    |    Commented March 28, 2007

Who will be willing to work in the field of elections if this doesn't stop? I think election officials should ban together and scream, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Cybersecurity in an "All-IP World" Are You Prepared?
In a recent survey conducted by Public CIO, over 125 respondents shared how they protect their environments from cyber threats and the challenges they see in an all-IP world. Read how your cybersecurity strategies and attitudes compare with your peers.
Maintain Your IT Budget with Consistent Compliance Practices
Between the demands of meeting federal IT compliance mandates, increasing cybersecurity threats, and ever-shrinking budgets, it’s not uncommon for routine maintenance tasks to slip among state and local government IT departments. If it’s been months, or even only days, since you have maintained your systems, your agency may not be prepared for a compliance audit—and that could have severe financial consequences. Regardless of your mission, consistent systems keep your data secure, your age
Best Practice Guide for Cloud and As-A-Service Procurements
While technology service options for government continue to evolve, procurement processes and policies have remained firmly rooted in practices that are no longer effective. This guide, built upon the collaborative work of state and local government and industry executives, outlines and explains the changes needed for more flexible and agile procurement processes.
View All

Featured Papers