Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

E-Vote: Election Technology Council Releases Industry Guidelines



January 9, 2008 By

The Election Technology Council -- consisting of companies that offer voting system technology hardware products, software and services -- today announced the release of industry guidelines outlining best practices for election officials to adopt in response to potential and perceived threats to electronic voting systems.

In releasing the guidelines,"Safeguarding The Vote," David Beirne, executive director of the Election Technology Council, said, "The Council recognizes that no voting technology is invulnerable, and as with other types of voting systems, it is critical for election administrators around the country to build robust procedures for safeguarding the use of electronic voting systems. Misconceptions concerning the operation of electronic voting systems, if left unanswered, can have a corrosive effect on voter confidence if they are not taken seriously and addressed with clear, factual information."

The published guidelines highlight common practices that county and state election officials can adopt leading up to, during and after Election Day. If adopted in their entirety, these procedures will provide clear evidence of the integrity of their voting systems and will assist in documenting the accuracy and validity of the election results, said the Council in a release. The guidelines list the most common perceived threats and provide clear mitigation strategies for each.

The integrity of all elections is dependent upon clear procedures to identify potential threats and detect them after an election is completed. Detection is the critical component when verifying the integrity of an election, said the Council. This is true in both the use of voting technologies and during the exercise of the voting process at the polling place.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All