Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

E-Vote: Ohio Secretary of State Calls Meetings This Week on Election Systems



February 26, 2008 By

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner announced the schedule for a series of town hall meetings across the state to communicate directly with Ohio voters about the status of Ohio's election systems.

On Dec. 14, 2007, Brunner released the findings of Project EVEREST (Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing), and in the weeks that followed, the issue has stirred dialogue and debate from a variety of constituent groups. Specifically, vulnerabilities that were discovered with Ohio's voting systems, including touch-screen voting machines, resulted in the Ohio Secretary of State's Office recommending the state move to optical-scan paper ballots for the November election.

"Ohio voters have a vested interest in how we conduct our elections - elections belong to the people," Brunner said. "I want to hear what people think about voting in Ohio our system, talk with them about what we discovered by conducting this study and hear from them their thoughts on changes being considered to our voting system."

Town Hall Meeting Schedule (All meetings begin at 7:00 p.m.)

  • Tuesday - Feb. 26, 2008 Pickaway-Ross Career & Technical Center, 895 Crouse Chapel Rd. Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 *Cafeteria
  • Wednesday - Feb. 27, 2008, Akron-Summit County Public Library, 60 South High St. Akron, Ohio 44326*Auditorium
  • Thursday - Feb. 28, 2008, Ohio University - Eastern 5425 National Rd. West St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 *Auditorium

"Most voters seem to be asking why the controversy over a change to paper ballots that will provide for greater accountability and confidence that their vote will be counted," Brunner said.

A public hearing was held in Columbus on Jan. 22, 2008 to provide an opportunity for the public and other interested parties to be heard.

"I am committed to continuing the dialogue about these issues, always keeping in mind that we have to do what is best for Ohio voters, whose confidence is best protected by measures that ensure a fair and accurate system of elections in Ohio," said Brunner.

A second round of public meetings addressing the research aspects of the study have also been scheduled on five university campuses. In the end, the secretary of state's office will have offered 10 opportunities for the public to be heard and learn about the issues concerning the state's voting systems. Citizens may also contact the secretary of state's office to voice their opinions and concerns at 1-800-SOS-OHIO or by e-mail at everest@sos.state.oh.us.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All