Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

E-Vote: Voting Machine Industry Says Federal Regulatory Process Broken

June 18, 2008 By

The Election Technology Council, an industry trade association representing providers of over 90 percent of the voting systems used in the United States, today issued a bleak assessment of the current state of the federal regulatory process administered by the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and called for significant reforms to better serve election officials and voters. Since February 2007, no voting system has achieved federal certification through the EAC. Since 2002, the standards have not changed, only the certifying agency.

"The industry is participating in and financing a process that remains indefinite in both time and money," said David Beirne, executive director of the ETC.

The industry's assessment describes a new federal agency that finds itself a victim of its own decisions which have effectively shut the regulated industry out and left it without a voice in the process. Among the key problems identified:

  • The EAC has yet to recognize the voting industry as a regulated industry. As a regulated industry, certain due process requirements should be afforded to industry providers during the EAC's policy setting and certification efforts. Since the voting industry currently finances federal certification of its products, decisions made by the EAC that are not subjected to full due process could deprive voting system providers of property and potentially lead to violations of the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment. ETC Recommendation: The EAC needs to clearly identify itself as a rulemaking agency when it comes to the adoption of rules and regulations governing its certification program and ensure due process rights are afforded to the industry.
  • EAC policies prohibiting informal communications, combined with the lack of industry representation throughout the voting system standards development process, are contrary to standard agency practices and the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). In tandem, these practices remove the industry's voice from the process and position the EAC in an adversarial role with the industry it intends to regulate. ETC Recommendation: The EAC's process for the creation of voting system standards lacks any industry representation. In order to achieve compliance with the "fair balance" requirement under the FACA, the EAC should appoint a representative from the industry as soon as possible.
  • Continued delays in federal certification and spiraling certification costs may lead to market failures for current industry providers. In addition, these circumstances will likely lead to a market consolidation and stifle future product innovation. ETC Recommendation: The industry is incurring the financial penalties stemming from a lack of agency readiness with its certification program. The EAC should take steps to bring the industry into the process to make sure that a greater understanding of market economics is incorporated into its policy-making.

Under the Help America Vote Act of 2002, the EAC is charged with adopting federal voting system standards. Both the federal standards and the federal certification process remain voluntary for each of the states. An estimated 40 states require some level of testing or certification against federal voting system standards. "In such a voluntary framework, the EAC would be better served by working with industry in its efforts to develop robust voting solutions. We respect the hard work and commitment of the EAC in grappling with these difficult issues, and we look forward to working cooperatively with the Commission in every way we can. However, the system cannot sustain itself in its current form without substantial reform," Beirne added.


| More


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All