Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee
  • Net App
  • NIC
  • Perceptive Software

E-Vote: What's On Presidential Candidate Web Sites?



November 5, 2007 By

As the presidential election approaches the "one year away" milestone, Bentley College political science professors Christine B. Williams and Jeff Gulati continue to monitor the candidates' Web sites for impact on their campaigns and how they use their sites to characterize their platforms.

"Even though the candidates are trying hard to distinguish themselves from competitors in their own parties during the nomination contest," said Williams, "their Web sites reveal more similarities than differences."

The Bentley professors' most recent examination focuses on how the candidates' sites treat "issues" including how they identify and prioritize them, the naming of specific groups, and outreach to ethnic minority or special interest communities.

Overall Democratic and Republican candidates give equally greater attention to domestic issues (75 percent) over foreign policy issues (25 percent), but there is a clear difference in their attention to social issues and named groups:

  • Democrats identify specific groups as an issue interest in 22.5 percent of their "Issues" headings; Republicans identify specific groups in only 1.7 percent.
  • Republicans identify social issues as interests in 24.1 percent of their "Issues" headings; Democrats identify social issues as interests in only 2.6 percent.

In 17 candidates' priority listings there are 20 issues that receive a first, second or third place ranking:

  • Iraq receives 8 first, second or third place mentions
  • Health care and taxes receive 6 mentions each
  • Terrorism and immigration receive 4 each
  • Spending/budget, middle and working class families, and U.S. world standing/leadership receive 3 each
  • Abortion and energy each receive 2
  • 10 other issues receive a single mention

 Democratic and Republican candidates differ in their issue priorities.

 Democrats identify the top issues as:

  • Iraq - 6 mentions
  • Health care - 5 mentions
  • U.S. world standing/leadership and middle/working class families - 3 mentions each

 Republicans identify the top issues as:

  • Taxes - 6 mentions
  • Immigration and terrorism - 4 mentions each
  • Spending/budget - 3 mentions

Three of the Democrats' first, second and third ranked issues do not appear in the Republicans' top listed issues:

  • Energy
  • U.S. world standing/leadership
  • Middle/ working class families

Four of the Republicans' first, second and third ranked issues do not appear in the Democrats' top listed issues:

  • Taxes
  • Immigration
  • Terrorism
  • Spending/budget

Williams notes that "Even at this early date, we see a clear differentiation of positions across party lines. Each side is appealing to its base with candidates emphasizing the issues where they perceive their party has the advantage."

To date, the presidential candidates' Web sites show modest outreach to ethnic minority or special interest communities:

  • Only 7 of the 18 have Spanish language content: Democrats Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Barack Obama, and Bill Richardson
  • Republican Mitt Romney

According to Gulati, "It is interesting that the candidates are not targeting Hispanics more extensively since they represent a growing force in key swing states in the Southwest and Rocky Mountains."

  • Only 8 have posted a list of affinity groups, ranging from women and African Americans to first responders and gun owners.
  • Of the 11 Web sites that post campaign photos on the homepage, 7 include a person of color: 4 out of 5 Democrats and 3 out of 6 Republicans.
  • Under the "Issues" headings, 12 identify a particular group such as seniors or veterans, the other 50 "Issues" headings identify specific policy areas.

This latest information is a follow up to Williams' and Gulati's initial findings from a general analysis of nine Democratic and 11 Republican presidential candidates' Websites conducted in April 2007.
The two professors have also analyzed campaign Web sites in the 2006 and previous years' Congressional elections. Their reports on this research can be found online.


| More

Comments


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
WHITEPAPER: D Block Spectrum Act and the FirstNet Broadband Network. What does it all mean?
On Feb 22, 2012, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 was enacted into law. This law will ensure the establishment of a nationwide, interoperable public safety broadband network in every state and territory in the U.S. Learn about the new law and what you can do to prepare for it now.
New Research Reveals Surprising Trend for Funding Innovation
Listen to an informative discussion with Digital Communities members to learn how you can use your IT savings and efficiencies to do the new things you have been waiting to do.
Continuity with Cloud Solutions
Cloud solutions provide agility, flexibility and scalability to government agencies. In an emergency situation where an agency’s infrastructure and resources are impacted, prioritization and restoration become critical elements of a disaster recovery plan. The flexibility of cloud services helps agencies make adjustments to processing capacity on demand.
View All

Digital Communities members get access to our collaboration task forces

427 Members

77 Discussions

84 Files

Latest members Become a member

Digital Communities members get access to our collaboration task forces

669 Members

145 Discussions

150 Files

Latest members Become a member

 


Featured White Papers & Reports

The Future of the Desktop in Government

Until recently, there was no alternative to the familiar desktop computer, and its expensive upgrades and maintenance requirements. For cash-strapped local governments, the desktop computer is quickly becoming an unsustainable option for future progress. Now, a technology known as virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) offers an alternative. It can be significantly more affordable than buying individual computers for every employee, and it provides similar capability. This paper shows how VDI is the future of the desktop and is a game-changer for local governments.


View Full Library

Events

GTC East

Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.

View All Events