Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Homeland Security Experts Recommend US/Canada Joint Threat Assessment


George Washington University Homeland Security Institute
George Washington University Homeland Security Institute

April 23, 2009 By

The Homeland Security Policy Institute (HSPI) has just released its latest Commentary, Canada and the United States: Time for a Joint Threat Assessment?

Founded in 2003, The George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute (HSPI) describes itself as a nonpartisan "think and do" tank whose mission is to build bridges between theory and practice through an interdisciplinary approach.

The new commentary -- authored by HSPI's Sharon Cardash, associate director; Frank Cilluffo, director; and James Jay Carafano, senior fellow -- suggests that a joint threat assessment could be "a powerful protective tool" for both countries, which "need not - and should not - diminish sovereign capabilities and capacities ..."

"A joint assessment would go a long way toward building a baseline consensus on the threat climate, which could serve as a foundation for proactive initiatives that would bolster safety and security on both sides of the border," said Cilluffo in a follow-up news statement.

At a minimum, the authors suggest, the scope of such an assessment should include:

- An evaluation of the level and nature of "homegrown" radicalization in the two countries as well as overseas;

- An analysis of concerning strategic and tactical developments and trends in the cyber arena;

- An examination of terrorist, organized crime, and other significant bad actors' travel to and between Canada and the United States (to include watch lists);

- An assessment of these actors' exploitation of and threats to the movement of cargo, mail, and both transnational and domestic supply chains; and

- An evaluation of vulnerabilities in the energy sector and infrastructure shared between the two nations, notably the power grid.

While fashioning such a joint assessment would certainly be a federal government responsibility, local law enforcement nevertheless might be also prompted to expand their own horizons, paying more attention to things happening in Canada that might impact their own regions.

The full article is available on the HSPI website at: http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/HSPI_Commentary02_USCanadaThreatAssess.pdf

Photo by Jinjian Liang. CC Attribution-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All