October 29, 2009 By Chad Vander Veen
Electronic voting has a bad rap it can't seem to shake. Across the country e-voting machines are regarded skeptically at best. Many citizen activists and some elections officials have re-embraced paper as the best and most accurate way to vote.
In May 2009, the city and county of Honolulu tried a different approach for electing members of its Neighborhood Boards. Instead of e-voting machines, residents voted either online or by phone. No paper ballots were available. The all-digital election -- which may be the first of its type in the United States -- didn't come about because the government sought to advance technology. The move was driven by a more pedestrian reason: budget cuts.
Although participation was low, city officials said eliminating paper ballots slashed typical election costs by half.
In Oahu, 33 Neighborhood Boards form the Neighborhood Commission. Those elected to the commission serve their constituents by advising other government entities about what is going on in Oahu's neighborhoods.
Bryan Mick, community relations specialist for the Neighborhood Commission Office, said the agency had to come up with a more efficient way to hold its elections.
"We did this at the direction of the City Council," Mick said. "They cut our budget to encourage us to go this route."
But Mick had been toying with the idea since he was brought onboard five years ago. A vendor called Kids Voting USA had caught Mick's attention. For eight years, Kids Voting USA has organized digital mock elections for local schools. The mock election results happen to mirror closely the actual election results, so Mick approached the company about crafting a pilot project for the Neighborhood Commission Office.
"They said it would be pretty simple to adapt software [for the Neighborhood Commission elections]," Mick said, "so we did a pilot project with them where we still did the paper ballots, but you also got an online code that you could use. They were integrated so if you did one, it negated the other. We scanned everything that came back in, and if you'd already voted online a red light would flash and we'd put that one aside."
Satisfied with the pilot project, the Neighborhood Commission Office revisited it when the City Council's budget ruling came down. But the office needed to partner with an organization that could quickly roll out a Web and telephone interface that was secure enough to put voters and local officials at ease.
The office found a San Diego-based company called Everyone Counts, which for the last decade, helped conduct digital elections in the UK and for military personnel and expatriates. The office hired Everyone Counts and began planning for a groundbreaking election.
"It's the first [election] in the U.S. that was all-digital," said Lori Steele, head of Everyone Counts. "That means they offered our computer solution and our telephone voting solution, and there was not a paper channel provided."
Much of what has held back e-voting -- and by association, digital elections -- is the issue of security. E-voting machines and their lack of paper trail, as well as proprietary code, have earned the reputation -- justly or not -- of being easy targets for hackers. Steele said her company's security protocol is like the two-key system required to launch a nuclear missile. In fact, Steele describes the security as "military grade."
"When we open our election, [password] keys are provided to a group of election officials," she said. "That can be, depending on the government and what their election rules are, people from different parties or people in the election office, or a combination thereof. The
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.