Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

IBM Controversy Won't Discredit Outsourcing, Says Texas Legislator



October 31, 2008 By

Texas Gov. Rick Perry's decision to halt the state's troubled data center outsourcing and consolidation with IBM begs this question: Is outsourcing really the way to make government functions more efficient? Robin MacEwan, chief of staff to Texas Rep. Carl Isett, who helped pass 2005 legislation mandating the consolidation, says outsourcing is still the right option for data centers.

"With any huge project, you're going to see hiccups and bumps along the way, things that need to be worked out," MacEwan said, adding that the project's difficulties could have just as easily happened if the state consolidated the data centers itself.

She praised the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) for withholding roughly $900,000 from IBM for not meeting server backup timeliness targets as defined in the outsourcing contract.

Perry froze the transfer of state data to IBM in an Oct. 28 letter to Brian Rawson, chief technology officer of Texas and executive director of the DIR, which awarded IBM the contract. Perry cited IBM's apparent failure to back up data for more than 20 agencies. The governor's order came a week after local media reported a July server failure in the Attorney General's Office that temporarily lost eight months of data.

"The problems that have been painfully documented over recent months, including state agency concerns about unreliable e-mail systems, administrative cost increases and other breakdowns, have resulted in a loss of confidence in the DIR's ability to provide Texas agencies with a proper level of service for technology services," Perry said in the letter.

IBM spokesman Jeff Tieszen contends the state's IT has steadily improved since the project began last year.

"There have been some issues with data backup and recovery, and IBM has been working with the Texas Department of Information Resources to resolve those issues as quickly as possible," Tieszen said in an e-mail.

The DIR is busy developing a plan with the governor's staff and state agencies to address unacceptable lapses in performance, said David Duncan, manager of the DIR's Communications and Strategic Partnerships Office.

"We are committed to restoring the confidence of the governor and other agencies in DIR's management of the data center services contract," Duncan said.

 


| More

Comments

Concerned Tax Payer    |    Commented November 5, 2008

It's that what it is called? "Bumps and Hickups?" Explain that to someone who cannot get their child's or elderly mom's medication on time, or did not get an unemployment check because there's a "hickup' in somebody's pet project.

Concerned Tax Payer    |    Commented November 5, 2008

It's that what it is called? "Bumps and Hickups?" Explain that to someone who cannot get their child's or elderly mom's medication on time, or did not get an unemployment check because there's a "hickup' in somebody's pet project.

Concerned Tax Payer    |    Commented November 5, 2008

It's that what it is called? "Bumps and Hickups?" Explain that to someone who cannot get their child's or elderly mom's medication on time, or did not get an unemployment check because there's a "hickup' in somebody's pet project.

Anonymous    |    Commented November 14, 2008

As the IT press you should interview the IT people who are still working for the state to find out how the contract at the ground level. Also, you should discuss with each IRM in each agency what they think about the contract execution. Get the real story from all sides not just the Capitol

Anonymous    |    Commented November 14, 2008

As the IT press you should interview the IT people who are still working for the state to find out how the contract at the ground level. Also, you should discuss with each IRM in each agency what they think about the contract execution. Get the real story from all sides not just the Capitol

Anonymous    |    Commented November 14, 2008

As the IT press you should interview the IT people who are still working for the state to find out how the contract at the ground level. Also, you should discuss with each IRM in each agency what they think about the contract execution. Get the real story from all sides not just the Capitol

Anonymous    |    Commented November 25, 2008

As one who's "in the trenches" for this disaster I firmly believe that the state could have certainly performed this consolidation without outsourcing. DIR could have combined some of the best and brightest IT people from the agencies and done this without losing so many folks. Plus we would have retained much of the pride of ownership many of us take in providing the best service for our users - something IBM is lacking. Perhaps Robin should ask the folks in PA how their consolidation is going - oh yeah, Larry Olsen shoved outsourcing down their throats before he came to Texas to help us save money.

Anonymous    |    Commented November 25, 2008

As one who's "in the trenches" for this disaster I firmly believe that the state could have certainly performed this consolidation without outsourcing. DIR could have combined some of the best and brightest IT people from the agencies and done this without losing so many folks. Plus we would have retained much of the pride of ownership many of us take in providing the best service for our users - something IBM is lacking. Perhaps Robin should ask the folks in PA how their consolidation is going - oh yeah, Larry Olsen shoved outsourcing down their throats before he came to Texas to help us save money.

Anonymous    |    Commented November 25, 2008

As one who's "in the trenches" for this disaster I firmly believe that the state could have certainly performed this consolidation without outsourcing. DIR could have combined some of the best and brightest IT people from the agencies and done this without losing so many folks. Plus we would have retained much of the pride of ownership many of us take in providing the best service for our users - something IBM is lacking. Perhaps Robin should ask the folks in PA how their consolidation is going - oh yeah, Larry Olsen shoved outsourcing down their throats before he came to Texas to help us save money.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All