November 3, 2008 By Corey McKenna
Photo: Jay Cohen, Department of Homeland Security, Under Secretary for Science and Technology. (Credit: DHS)
Just do it. Nike's slogan nicely captures the entrepreneurial approach to technology development that drives the Science and Technology Directorate at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. To hear Jay Cohen, undersecretary of the S & T Directorate, talk about technology development for the defense of the homeland, one would be forgiven for mistaking him for a chief executive of a Silicon Valley start-up. He's brimming with energy and optimism about the prospect of public-private partnerships developing technology to secure the homeland.
Cohen oversees an agency with an $830 million dollar budget, nearly half of which is devoted to the directorate's high-priority technology needs. About 10 percent of the budget goes into further innovation in homeland security technology and about 1 percent of the budget goes into a rapid-development fund. Projects in that fund must cost less than $1 million and have a time-to-market of less than a year.
In order to reduce redundancy, the DHS cannot recreate any of the programs of the Centers for Disease Control or others. "We provide technology solutions from around the world," Cohen said.
S and T has around 250 projects under development at any one time for completion in between one to five years, and each of those projects is reviewed against performance metrics every six months. Of these projects, Cohen expects 50 percent of them will fail. That's all a part of the directorate's entrepreneurial culture. "S and T is 1000 miles wide and one millimeter deep, " he explained.
The way the directorate operates is that a Department of Homeland Security component agency, such as Customs and Border Patrol, awards a contract for a technology solution and then the S and T Directorate works to make it better. Once a DHS component has acquired the technology, state and local first responders can purchase the technology from DHS.
Interoperability -- Interoperability is a governance issue, Cohen said. He noted that before a bomb technician from a local police department can jam a bomb, he has to receive a permit from the Federal Communications Commission. The U.S. would not fight a war like the local chain of command is, he noted.
Counter IEDs -- Cohen, quoting Thomas Friedman, told attendees at the conference "IEDs are coming to a theater near you." Improvised explosive devices are not weapons of mass destruction, but weapons of mass influence, he said.
Cyber Security - Cyber security is a very difficult challenge, Cohen said. He acknowledged the air force and Congress for their cyber efforts and increasing the security of .gov domains. He noted the importance of the security of the cyber component of the nation's critical infrastructure and that the federal government is planning to spend $17 billion on cyber security in the next five years.
Another major project the directorate is funding is a 3-D personnel location technology-that is, not only pinpointing first responders as to their latitude and longitude coordinates, but their location within a building as well. Additionally, the directorate is funding improvements in biometric identification, an improved vehicle stopping technology and a breathing apparatus. The directorate is also working on is a container scanner that can detect nuclear, biological, chemical and conventional explosive compounds as well as a stowaway passenger in 45 seconds.
Homeland Security vs. Department of Defense
The DHS is not "DoD light", Cohen noted. The two agencies measure results very differently. DoD measures its results in terms of targets killed, captured or destroyed "over there" without forensics, Cohen noted. At DHS on the other hand, being fundamentally a Department of Justice-based agency forensics are everything. Since they must adhere to the Constitution, DHS investigators need
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.