Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Mayors Against Illegal Guns Urge Elimination of Barriers to Sharing Gun Trace Data



July 17, 2007 By

Photo: NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg

The bi-partisan coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns last Tuesday stood on Capitol Hill with law enforcement officials and members of Congress to urge the repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment. The event came on the eve of a vote in the House Appropriations Committee. The mayors oppose the Tiahrt Amendment, named after Kansas Representative Todd Tiahrt who has sponsored it, because of how it restricts the access of cities and law enforcement to gun trace data, an essential crime fighting tool. The removal of the Tiahrt Amendment is the top legislative priority of the over 225-member Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition, co-chaired by New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino, who led last week's event.

The Tiahrt Amendment, a version of which has been inserted into the Department of Justice appropriations bill each year since Fiscal Year 2003, places broad restrictions on the use of gun trace data, which gives investigators information on where a gun was purchased and who it was sold to. The Tiahrt Amendment also prevents local governments and police from accessing federal gun trace data from areas outside their immediate geographic jurisdiction; prevents cities from using trace data in state and local civil enforcement actions, including gun license revocations; and prevents the ATF from publishing reports that use gun trace data to analyze nationwide gun trafficking patterns.

"The Tiahrt Amendment is the most anti-cop, soft-on-crime law Congress has passed in years," said Mayor Bloomberg. "It prevents our police officers from tracking the illegal gun trade - and locking up those who engage in it. Imagine if Congress put the same constraints on police when investigating illegal drug sales -- no one would stand for it. The House Appropriations Committee is scheduled to vote on a bill that currently includes the Tiahrt Amendment. If the bill is passed, it would be an insult to thousands of police officers who face the threat of illegal guns."

"Mayors from across the country, who are on the front lines of public safety, are saying enough is enough," said Menino. "It is time Washington stopped ignoring the violence caused by illegal guns every day. We need to stop protecting rogue gun dealers and start protecting our police by removing the Tiahrt Amendment and the restrictions it imposes on law enforcement."

The Mayors' campaign to remove the Tiahrt Amendment enjoys wide support from law enforcement. Thirty-four national, state and regional law enforcement organizations have come out against the Tiahrt Amendment - including the National Sheriffs' Association, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police and the Texas Association of Chiefs of Police. Further, 28 newspaper editorial boards are on the record opposing the Tiahrt Amendment, including the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Cincinnati Enquirer, the Indianapolis Star, the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune and the Wichita Eagle - the hometown paper of Representative Tiahrt. Also, 212 law enforcement executives have come out against the Tiahrt Amendment on behalf of their jurisdictions.

"The police in Chicago and every other city are working day and night to keep illegal guns out of the hands of criminals, and they need help -- not hindrance -- from their senators and representatives in Washington, D.C.," said Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley. "I can't believe that anyone who's in favor of law and order would want to tie the hands of our police when it comes to tracing the guns used in crimes. Instead of protecting the gun lobby, Congress should be protecting the people of this nation from the gun violence that claims the lives of 30,000 of their constituents each year."


| More

Comments

   |    Commented July 20, 2007

This organization is simply making another attempt (in my opinion "encouraged" by Mayor Bloomberg) to gain power by attacking the Second Ammendment rights of law-abiding citizens. Removal of these restrictions will lead to invasion of the privacy of American citizens, and abuse of our judicial system to restrict/eliminate legal and necessary economic activity in the manufacture of quality firearms by American companies. These activities have been engaged in during the past several years by members of the organization named in the title of the article, and the Tiahrt Amendment has put a stop to their abuses. We have enough laws on the books to deal with the complaints raised by this organization and others named in the article, IF these laws are enforced. What they are attempting to do is akin to punishing the entire population for the transgressions of a few individuals. The economic impact of this organization''''s agenda, is in my opinion, unamerican. I stated above that this ecomomic activity was necessary; if we eliminate arms manufacturing from our economy, as a country we become dependent on foreign manufacturers for the arms we need for our own defense. This does not make sense in any way, shape or form, unless you have "interests" in foreign arms manufacturers. We should learn, and then apply, the lessons learned from our dependence on foreign oil, to what dependence on foreign arms would be like, especially when we cannot really count on interests of any given ally to always coincide with our own. Thank you for reading this through.

   |    Commented July 20, 2007

This organization is simply making another attempt (in my opinion "encouraged" by Mayor Bloomberg) to gain power by attacking the Second Ammendment rights of law-abiding citizens. Removal of these restrictions will lead to invasion of the privacy of American citizens, and abuse of our judicial system to restrict/eliminate legal and necessary economic activity in the manufacture of quality firearms by American companies. These activities have been engaged in during the past several years by members of the organization named in the title of the article, and the Tiahrt Amendment has put a stop to their abuses. We have enough laws on the books to deal with the complaints raised by this organization and others named in the article, IF these laws are enforced. What they are attempting to do is akin to punishing the entire population for the transgressions of a few individuals. The economic impact of this organization''''s agenda, is in my opinion, unamerican. I stated above that this ecomomic activity was necessary; if we eliminate arms manufacturing from our economy, as a country we become dependent on foreign manufacturers for the arms we need for our own defense. This does not make sense in any way, shape or form, unless you have "interests" in foreign arms manufacturers. We should learn, and then apply, the lessons learned from our dependence on foreign oil, to what dependence on foreign arms would be like, especially when we cannot really count on interests of any given ally to always coincide with our own. Thank you for reading this through.

   |    Commented July 20, 2007

This organization is simply making another attempt (in my opinion "encouraged" by Mayor Bloomberg) to gain power by attacking the Second Ammendment rights of law-abiding citizens. Removal of these restrictions will lead to invasion of the privacy of American citizens, and abuse of our judicial system to restrict/eliminate legal and necessary economic activity in the manufacture of quality firearms by American companies. These activities have been engaged in during the past several years by members of the organization named in the title of the article, and the Tiahrt Amendment has put a stop to their abuses. We have enough laws on the books to deal with the complaints raised by this organization and others named in the article, IF these laws are enforced. What they are attempting to do is akin to punishing the entire population for the transgressions of a few individuals. The economic impact of this organization''''s agenda, is in my opinion, unamerican. I stated above that this ecomomic activity was necessary; if we eliminate arms manufacturing from our economy, as a country we become dependent on foreign manufacturers for the arms we need for our own defense. This does not make sense in any way, shape or form, unless you have "interests" in foreign arms manufacturers. We should learn, and then apply, the lessons learned from our dependence on foreign oil, to what dependence on foreign arms would be like, especially when we cannot really count on interests of any given ally to always coincide with our own. Thank you for reading this through.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All