Government Technology

Microsoft Loses Appeal, Can No Longer Sell Word



December 22, 2009 By

A federal appeals court upheld Tuesday, Dec. 22, a $290 million patent infringement suit against Microsoft. The suit, brought by I4i, a Toronto-based firm that sells XML software, claimed that Microsoft had infringed on I4i's patented XML editor in the 2003 and 2007 versions of Word.

The suit was filed in 2007, and in August a Texas jury sided with I4i. Judge Leonard Davis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas fined Microsoft $290 million and forbid the company from selling the offending versions of Word. Microsoft appealed, but that appeal was struck down Tuesday by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

These actions mean that as of Jan. 11, 2010, Microsoft may no longer sell existing copies of Word 2003 or Word 2007. The company may continue to provide customer and technical support to current customers. Microsoft may resume selling Word when the offending code is removed or a workaround is found.

"With respect to Microsoft Word 2007 and Microsoft Office 2007, we have been preparing for this possibility since the District Court issued its injunction in August 2009 and have put the wheels in motion to remove this little-used feature from these products," said Kevin Kutz, Microsoft's director of public affairs, in a company statement. "Therefore, we expect to have copies of Microsoft Word 2007 and Office 2007, with this feature removed, available for U.S. sale and distribution by the injunction date. In addition, the beta versions of Microsoft Word 2010 and Microsoft Office 2010, which are available now for downloading, do not contain the technology covered by the injunction.

"While we are moving quickly to address the injunction issue, we are also considering our legal options, which could include a request for a rehearing by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals en banc or a request for a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court."

For the court's complete ruling, visit: http://www.i4ilp.com/court/JudgesRulingOnAppeal.pdf


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Maintain Your IT Budget with Consistent Compliance Practices
Between the demands of meeting federal IT compliance mandates, increasing cybersecurity threats, and ever-shrinking budgets, it’s not uncommon for routine maintenance tasks to slip among state and local government IT departments. If it’s been months, or even only days, since you have maintained your systems, your agency may not be prepared for a compliance audit—and that could have severe financial consequences. Regardless of your mission, consistent systems keep your data secure, your age
Best Practice Guide for Cloud and As-A-Service Procurements
While technology service options for government continue to evolve, procurement processes and policies have remained firmly rooted in practices that are no longer effective. This guide, built upon the collaborative work of state and local government and industry executives, outlines and explains the changes needed for more flexible and agile procurement processes.
Fresh Ideas In Online Security for Public Safety Organizations
Lesley Carhart, Senior Information Security Specialist at Motorola Solutions, knows that online and computer security are more challenging than ever. Personal smartphones, removable devices like USB storage drives, and social media have a significant impact on security. In “Fresh Ideas in Online Security for Public Safely Organizations,” Lesley provides recommendations to improve your online security against threats from social networks, removable devices, weak passwords and digital photos.
View All

Featured Papers