Government Technology

New York City Congestion Pricing Plan Fails in Albany



April 8, 2008 By

New York Gov. David A. Paterson yesterday acknowledged that the New York City congestion pricing plan he submitted to the state Legislature had failed, saying: "Earlier today congestion pricing failed to achieve the consensus necessary to move forward on the state level. As I've said all along, this is an important program to reduce congestion and pollution in New York City while raising vitally needed funds for mass transit."

The plan would have levied an $8 fee on vehicles entering the congested area south of 60th street in Manhattan. Opponents in the Legislature, however, termed it "elitist" and cited it as an obstacle to free movement about the city.

"Now we need to come up with innovative approaches to the challenge of funding mass transit," continued Paterson. "Over the next several days I will be working closely with my colleagues in the Legislature and experts both in and outside of government to arrive at such solutions."

New York City Mayor Bloomberg, who included the congestion pricing plan in his PlaNYC, and was supported by the City Council, was clearly miffed by the failure, saying today  that it was a "market-based solution to unsnarling the traffic tie-ups that sap $13 billion a year from our regional economy and foul the air we breathe. And in the bargain, it also could create a dedicated fund for mass transit improvements."

Forwarding the proposal were what Bloomberg termed "a coalition of liberals and conservatives; environmentalists and business leaders; developers and preservationists: People who in the past haven't been able to agree on the time of day. But unfortunately," continued Bloomberg in a release, "as most of you know, yesterday the majority caucus in the Assembly chose not to bring the governor's congestion pricing bill to a vote -- effectively killing it. They complained about the inconvenience -- even though most New Yorkers don't drive. They said it hadn't been studied enough -- despite an entire years' worth of analysis, following a process they had established. And ultimately, they didn't even have the courage to vote on it -- they just killed it in a back room."

Bloomberg continued, saying congestion pricing was one of only 127 items in the PlaNYC agenda and many of them require no approval from other branches of government. "One thing that I've learned in government is that there's always a good reason to do nothing. But business -- and government, too -- both increasingly recognize that going green is the best -- indeed the only -- pro-growth strategy, not just for the long term, but in the short run as well."

 

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Redefining Citizen Engagement in a Mobile-First World
Today’s consumers are embracing the ease and convenience of anytime, anywhere access to the Internet from their mobile devices. In order for government and public sector organizations to fully engage with their citizens and provide similar service quality as their consumer counterparts, the time is now to shift to mobile citizen engagement. Learn more
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager and Threat Intelligence Exchange
As a part of the Intel® Security product offering, McAfee® Enterprise Security Manager and McAfee Threat Intelligence Exchange work together to provide organizations with exactly what they need to fight advanced threats. You get the situational awareness, actionable intelligence, and instantaneous speed to immediately identify, respond to, and proactively neutralize threats in just milliseconds.
Better security. Better government.
Powering security at all levels of government with simpler, more connected IT.
View All

Featured Papers