Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • AT&T Logo
  • McAfee
  • Net App

New York City Congestion Pricing Plan Fails in Albany



April 8, 2008 By

New York Gov. David A. Paterson yesterday acknowledged that the New York City congestion pricing plan he submitted to the state Legislature had failed, saying: "Earlier today congestion pricing failed to achieve the consensus necessary to move forward on the state level. As I've said all along, this is an important program to reduce congestion and pollution in New York City while raising vitally needed funds for mass transit."

The plan would have levied an $8 fee on vehicles entering the congested area south of 60th street in Manhattan. Opponents in the Legislature, however, termed it "elitist" and cited it as an obstacle to free movement about the city.

"Now we need to come up with innovative approaches to the challenge of funding mass transit," continued Paterson. "Over the next several days I will be working closely with my colleagues in the Legislature and experts both in and outside of government to arrive at such solutions."

New York City Mayor Bloomberg, who included the congestion pricing plan in his PlaNYC, and was supported by the City Council, was clearly miffed by the failure, saying today  that it was a "market-based solution to unsnarling the traffic tie-ups that sap $13 billion a year from our regional economy and foul the air we breathe. And in the bargain, it also could create a dedicated fund for mass transit improvements."

Forwarding the proposal were what Bloomberg termed "a coalition of liberals and conservatives; environmentalists and business leaders; developers and preservationists: People who in the past haven't been able to agree on the time of day. But unfortunately," continued Bloomberg in a release, "as most of you know, yesterday the majority caucus in the Assembly chose not to bring the governor's congestion pricing bill to a vote -- effectively killing it. They complained about the inconvenience -- even though most New Yorkers don't drive. They said it hadn't been studied enough -- despite an entire years' worth of analysis, following a process they had established. And ultimately, they didn't even have the courage to vote on it -- they just killed it in a back room."

Bloomberg continued, saying congestion pricing was one of only 127 items in the PlaNYC agenda and many of them require no approval from other branches of government. "One thing that I've learned in government is that there's always a good reason to do nothing. But business -- and government, too -- both increasingly recognize that going green is the best -- indeed the only -- pro-growth strategy, not just for the long term, but in the short run as well."

 

 


| More

Comments


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Identity and Access Management Considerations
Gain insight into enterprise identity and access management (IAM) trends and a unified approach that can simplify identity and access management before, during, and after your organization implements cloud-based services.
Document Driven Process Automation and Human Services
By the Center for Digital Government

Read this Center for Digital Government issue to find out how document-driven process automation can drastically accelerate workflow in state and local government human services agencies.
Using Wireless Technology to Manage and Optimize Government Fleets: Saving Money, Generating Revenues, and Increasing Safety
Using Wireless Technology to Manage and Optimize Government Fleets: Saving Money, Generating Revenues, and Increasing Safety. The paper discusses the challenges federal, state and local government agencies currently face with their government fleets; how mobile technology can help; considerations when selecting a mobile solutions partner; and the benefits of choosing Sprint. Specifically, Frost & Sullivan highlights Sprint’s fleet expertise, its powerful networks, and advanced partnerships that work in concert to provide government fleets with the ability to: Save money, Generate new revenues, Enhance safety, Help the environment, Increase the availability and transparency of information to the public
View All

RSS

Digital Communities members get access to our collaboration task forces

427 Members

77 Discussions

84 Files

Latest members Become a member

Digital Communities members get access to our collaboration task forces

669 Members

145 Discussions

150 Files

Latest members Become a member

 


Featured White Papers & Reports

CIOs Redefine Local Government and Industry Relations

Based off of discussions of the Digital Communities Large Jurisdiction Chief Information Officer (CIO) Working Group, this white paper aims to answer the question, "In today's economic, political and business environment, what constitutes a successful relationship between government and industry?" Cause for Optimism identifies and clarifies the issues that separate government and industry, and begins to find an answer to the question necessary for both to enjoy a successful and prosperous future.


View Full Library

Events

GTC East

Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.

View All Events