Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Obama, Congress to Revisit Real ID



April 23, 2009 By

This article reprinted with permission of Stateline.org

Congress and the Obama administration are considering ceding key ground in a long-running battle between the federal government and the states over Real ID, the 4-year-old federal program that requires all states to start issuing more secure driver's licenses by the end of the year.

Proposed legislation being circulated on Capitol Hill would give states more time, flexibility and money to meet federal Real ID requirements.

For the nation's more than 245 million drivers, the legislation would allow them to keep using their current driver's licenses to board commercial flights or enter federal buildings for the foreseeable future. Under Real ID, residents of states that do not meet a checklist of license upgrades would be unable to use those licenses for federal purposes beginning in January.

The congressional proposal may have the backing of the Obama administration. In an appearance Wednesday (April 22) in Washington, D.C., Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano gave the clearest indication to date that the administration plans to push for changes that are favorable to the states.

"We've been, over the last weeks, meeting with governors of both parties to look at a way to repeal Real ID and substitute something else that ... accomplishes some of the same goals. And we hope to announce something on that soon," Napolitano said. As governor of Arizona, Napolitano signed a bill prohibiting the state from complying with Real ID; she now oversees the program.

The Real ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, was intended to create nationwide security standards for driver's licenses to prevent them from falling into the hands of terrorists and illegal immigrants. The law is based on a recommendation by the 9/11 Commission, the independent panel that investigated the 2001 terrorist attacks and found that the Sept. 11 hijackers had obtained 30 pieces of state identification.

But states have revolted at Real ID, calling it an "unfunded federal mandate" that infringes on a core state responsibility: the issuance of driver's licenses.

Since 2005, at least 18 states have passed legislation opposing Real ID, either through non-binding resolutions or through statutes that expressly prohibit participation in the program, according to a database kept by the National Conference of State Legislatures. The organization, which represents the nation's more than 7,000 state legislators, will discuss the new congressional proposal on Friday (April 24) during its annual conference in Washington, D.C.

"A lot of us believe that Real ID is a slap in the face of (state) legislative prerogative," said Oregon state Sen. Bruce Starr (R), who this month voted for a bill that would prevent the state from spending any more money on Real ID unless the federal government steps up funding.

The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that Real ID will cost states $3.9 billion over 10 years, but the federal government has provided only about $135 million to states so far, said Molly Ramsdell, an NCSL analyst.

Separately, many state lawmakers -- and the American Civil Liberties Union -- have raised privacy concerns, calling Real ID a "national ID card" that could jeopardize personal data collected from millions of Americans.

With those objections in mind, state lawmakers across the ideological divide -- from fiscal conservatives concerned about the costs of Real ID to civil libertarians alarmed about privacy implications -- have banded together to oppose the law.

At the same time, many states already have moved forward independently on making their driver's licenses more secure, even if they have concerns about Real ID. Maryland, for example, recently agreed to ban illegal immigrants from receiving driver's licenses -- one of the key provisions of Real ID.

Even some states that have statutes opposing Real ID have taken


| More

Comments

Dr_Thomas    |    Commented June 12, 2009

Anyone who read Bruce Schneier knows this is a real bad idea, but then there has been a large amount of those coming from Washington over the past few years. If states do not start to be resistive, the federal nimrods will legislate us all into bankruptcy.

Dr_Thomas    |    Commented June 12, 2009

Anyone who read Bruce Schneier knows this is a real bad idea, but then there has been a large amount of those coming from Washington over the past few years. If states do not start to be resistive, the federal nimrods will legislate us all into bankruptcy.

Dr_Thomas    |    Commented June 12, 2009

Anyone who read Bruce Schneier knows this is a real bad idea, but then there has been a large amount of those coming from Washington over the past few years. If states do not start to be resistive, the federal nimrods will legislate us all into bankruptcy.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All