November 26, 2007 By Reid Goldsborough
In getting to Web sites, neatness counts. If you type in the wrong Web address, you might be in for a surprise.
You could be taken to a site run by a business that competes with the site you were trying to get to, to a rogue site that lampoons the intended site, to a porn site that tricks you or your children into its seediness, or to a spam or phishing site that steals your e-mail address, your money or your identity.
This phenomenon goes by the names "typosquatting" and "URL hijacking." A new study by McAfee, a maker of computer security software, sheds some interesting light on it. Among its findings:
Among the more celebrated examples of typosquatting have involved the Web search site Google and the user-written Web encyclopedia Wikipedia. By mistyping www.google.com as www.goggle.com, users were taken to the site of a rogue software maker that automatically downloaded spyware to their computers.
Wikipedia endured a similar experience. By mistyping www.wikipedia.org as www.eikipedia.org, www.wilipedia.org or www.wikipedi.com, or by mistyping en.wikipedia.org as en.wiipedia.org, en.wikipedi.org or en.wikipediia.org, users were directed to sites with pop-up ads, spyware downloads and ad-generating Web directories.
Typosquatters bank on the fact that people make simple typing mistakes, misspell words, add an "s" to make a name plural when it shouldn't be, and get the top-level domain wrong by typing "com" instead of "org," for example.
"Typosquatting illustrates the wild west mentality that remains dominant in major portions of the Internet," says Jeff Green, a McAfee senior vice president. "Even at its most benign, this practice takes consumers to places they never intended and penalizes legitimate businesses by siphoning customers away."
One common technique used by typosquatters is to profit from click-through ad revenue. Legitimate ad syndication services affiliated with Google and other search sites enable typosquatters to make money by tricking people into coming to their sites, where revenue-generating ads are displayed.
Another, more nefarious, technique is to continue the ruse by tricking people into thinking they're at the real site, using copied logos, page layouts and content. When you then type in credit card, Social Security and other sensitive data, the criminals use that data to steal your money and your identity.
Typosquatting isn't a new phenomenon, but it is increasing in frequency, judging by the number of cases filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization's arbitration system. This is one remedial method available to sites whose addresses have been copied.
Another method is to send, or have your lawyer send, a cease and desist letter or e-mail to the typosquatting site, which is more effective if the copying was innocent rather than venal. In some cases these disputes wind up in court.
Some companies try to prevent typosquatting by registering or buying a few or many different Web addresses
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.