October 8, 2009 By Reid Goldsborough
Online user reviews are a great concept. With Web sites that offer them, you can read the experiences of other consumers with whatever you're thinking about buying, from a computer to a cruise vacation.
Like all great concepts, this one though useful can sometimes be flawed in its execution.
Part of the problem comes from "astroturfing." This is the practice of a company or its public relations or advertising agency planting positive reviews that appear to be from actual customers. Instead of the grass [review] being real, it's artificial, like AstroTurf.
Little can be done about this trickery except to develop a discerning eye for it. If a review is glowingly positive, full of superlatives, don't automatically discount it; just be skeptical. Same with a review that's entirely negative. It could have been planted by a competitor.
A bigger problem than astroturfing, according to those who follow this, is honest reviews written by actual customers that just aren't useful. Unhelpful reviews typically result from the fact that most people have little experience writing reviews and don't have the knowledge or background to add the context needed for the review to be as useful as it could be.
This can be solved fairly easily, and you can be a part of the solution, by keeping a few simple things in mind when you write user reviews yourself, according to Esther Schindler, a professional freelance writer who has also written more than 400 (free) reviews on Amazon.com.
This well-regarded Web marketplace does a good job of helping you decide if any given review is worth paying attention to. It lets users review the reviews, and it includes with each review the number of people who reviewed it and the number who found the review helpful. Amazon.com then places the reviews that users find more useful before those they find less useful.
The most important thing to keep in mind to make the reviews you write most useful, said Schindler through e-mail, is to put yourself in your readers' shoes. Write for them, not for yourself. "Readers want to know if THEY are going to like the product. They're interested in your opinion only insofar as it helps them make a good buying decision."
Think about the types of users who will be reading your review. Depending on the product, some will be newcomers, some will have a bit of experience with the product category, and some will be experts with lots of technical knowledge. When relevant, try to meet the needs of each type.
Along with thinking about your readers, think carefully about the product, beyond simply whether or not you like it. As an aid in this process, said Schindler, ask yourself these three questions:
What a product promises and how well it fulfills that promise means talking about specific features of the product. Why is a key question here. "Explain WHY you feel the way you do," said Schindler.
Along with what a product does and how well it does it, talk also about what it doesn't do, any features it may lack that you would have found useful.
Instead of interspersing what you like and what you don't like about a product, most readers prefer that you describe what you like first followed by what you don't like, said Schindler. Don't just provide a long list of features but instead talk about what's useful or well-executed and what's not.
As commonsensical as it may sound, read the instructions when appropriate before evaluating the product. Sometimes certain features reveal themselves only when you do this.
Reviews are almost always better when you've worked with a product over a period of time rather than merely providing a "first look." A gee-whiz feature may get old quickly rather than being truly useful.
The best professional reviewers distinguish themselves by talking also about similar products on the market. Amateur reviewers won't always be able to do this, but if you can, even if it's only a product you used before this one, it will make your review more useful. What's different, better or worse, about this product?
If appropriate, talk briefly about your experience and why you're qualified to offer judgments about this type of product.
Finally, be succinct. Get to the substance quickly rather than forcing readers to wade through a lot of introductory material. When you reach the end, stop.
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.