Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Pittsburgh Seeks to Deter, Record Crime With More Cameras


Streetlight Surveillance Camera
Streetlight Surveillance Camera

April 7, 2010 By

Eyeing technology as a way to deter and fight crime, Pittsburgh recently submitted a federal application to install 220 cameras, enough to cover nearly every neighborhood.

In a joint request with the Community College of Allegheny County and Carnegie Mellon University, the city asked for $12 million to $14 million in Broadband Technology Opportunities Program funds, being dispensed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, to buy security cameras, install a wireless network to operate them and create software to filter the content.

"Going after this money is a way for the mayor [Luke Ravenstahl] to fulfill his dream to put cameras all over the city," said City CIO Howard Stern. "He feels very strongly that cameras are a strong deterrent to crime -- unfortunately they cost a lot of money."

The city currently has 20 "city-owned" cameras installed in neighborhoods, with plans to have 50 more put up along the waterways by this summer, Stern said. With a 10-page privacy policy and needed infrastructure in place, the city should be able to handle 220 additional cameras, Stern said.

And they've already proven to be more than a crime deterrent -- they've helped law enforcement identify suspects in high-profile cases. The most recent example is two teenage boys arrested April 1 in connection to the March 14 murder of a retired firefighter.

"This is a system that we'll use when we need it," Stern said of the monitoring system, which is not manned 24 hours a day and is only accessible by authorized personnel. "I can't even look at it," Stern added.

The camera system recognizes loud noises such as gunshots or car backfires, Stern said, and will alert police to such incidents. But they don't, and legally can't record conversations, so the monitoring system records decibel levels and triggers an alert when they hit a specific range, he said.

The city started installing cameras two years ago, through a $2.4 million Department of Homeland Security grant aimed at protecting its waterways, ports and rivers, Stern said. Mayor Ravenstahl, who made an initiative to curb crime, wanted "to get cameras everywhere." So city staff brought in experts from the local college and university to discuss obtaining funds to have cameras spread citywide and make the city wireless.

Before installing the cameras, Stern created a policy that addressed concerns such as the length of time footage would be kept, how the cameras would be used and privacy issues. It took him a year to flesh out a policy that addressed all stakeholders' concerns, including the American Civil Liberties Union, who opposed the entire concept, Stern said.

"The ACLU said, 'We hate this program, but if you're going to have to have cameras, this is as good as it gets,'" he said. "They hate this but realize it's a fact of life and feel the policy we developed was tolerable."

The city also had to address citizen concerns, who don't like the idea of "Big Brother" spying on them, Stern said. The cameras won't be used to watch women walking down the street or listen in on people's conversations -- conclusions many jump to.

"The beauty of the system is we can move cameras to new high-crime areas at minimal expense," Stern said. "We're hoping and are optimistic that we'll get it."

To view the city's press release on the subject, visit the Web site.

View a copy of the city's privacy policy for public security camera systems.

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All