Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Providence, R.I., Builds on Port Security With Chemical Sensors



Marine lt. Col. Peter Gaynor and Providence RI Mayor Cicilline

August 19, 2010 By

"You can actually see a ship moving and then click on that ship and see what the name of it is, where it came from, where it's going [and] what it's carrying," -- PEMA Director Peter Gaynor (pictured on left with Providence Mayor David N. Cicilline)

Three new chemical sensors were installed at the Port of Providence in Rhode Island on Aug. 16. The sensors will be integrated with the city's existing Port Area Waterside Surveillance System (PAWSS), providing chemical sensor data to the state's common operating picture. The Providence Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) is funding the $593,000 project with a grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The surveillance project began in 2006 when the state's Department of Environmental Management used a port security grant to place cameras and maritime radar on the lower part of Narragansett Bay. Providence later received another grant to complete video coverage of the bay and install additional radar. Now PAWSS covers an area from the southern entrance of the bay 25 miles north to the port

PAWSS is built on Raytheon's Athena information collection and analysis suite, providing access to the cameras, radar, sensors (Smiths Detection Centurion II) and the port's Automatic Identification System in one place. "You can actually see a ship moving and then click on that ship and see what the name of it is, where it came from, where it's going [and] what it's carrying," said PEMA Director Peter Gaynor.

The sensors detect industrial chemicals and common chemical warfare agents, and are equipped with video cameras. "Part of determining whether it's a false hit is a camera turns on the potential plume to see if it was, say a truck driving by," Gaynor said.

The sensors couldn't cover the entire port, so PEMA conducted surveys and surveillance to find the best locations. "We have an intersection at the perimeter of the port where we have a pretty highly traveled secondary road," he said. "People coming out of the city, passengers coming going to work; that's mixed with commercial trucks carrying all sorts of stuff, which is bisected by a rail line. That may be a good place to put a sensor and a camera."

Community Chemical Notification

Once the chemical sensors have been installed and tested, the sensors will be integrated with four notification sirens near the port to automatically alert the community of a release.

Three of the sirens are in Providence, with one on the Johnson & Wales University campus. The fourth siren is south of the port in Cranston.

"We want to take it a step further and have some ability to e-mail those alerts out to stakeholders, police, fire, businesses down there, to give them a heads up in near real time," Gaynor said. He estimated that it would be three or four months before that happened.

The ability to deploy the sirens, PAWSS and chemical sensors is based on a strong partnership between the city, the port, Johnson & Wales University, Cranston and East Providence, Gaynor said. "It's multijurisdictional, so we want to try to create a regional capability," he said.

Right now if there's a chemical release at the port that tenants can't handle, they call 911 and the local fire department responds. Gaynor estimated the time from receipt of the call to when an engine arrives on scene is 10 minutes in a worst-case scenario. "If we can cut that in half, that's significant," he said.

 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All