January 23, 2008 By Indrajit Basu, International Correspondent
A multinational effort provided humanitarian assistance and support to Pakistan and parts of India and Afghanistan following the devastating Oct. 8 earthquake in 2005.
Lack of an institutional base, adequate commitment, and demand from the users of the service, are threatening the continuity of a novel information and communication technology-enabled disaster management system in Pakistan, which is on the brink of closing down unless the current coordinators can seek out a buyer who can take it forward.
The current managers of RISEPAK -- short of Relief Information System for Earthquakes Pakistan -- say that the project may have run its course in its present form and now needs a "committed institutional home or something that is not dependent on a personality but an institution," to realize its full potential and thrive.
Created in October 2005 by a consortium of Pakistani academics, The World Bank, and World Online (Lahore) with the operational hub at the Lahore University of Management (LUM) in Lahore, Pakistan, RISEPAK is a public portal that acts as an earthquake relief coordination and accountability tool for collecting, collating and displaying information about damage, access and relief for rural Pakistani citizens affected by the 2005 earthquake.
According to its founders, the aftermath of any disaster -- particularly in an underdeveloped country like Pakistan where a large number of relief-agencies, big and small, act in a largely uncoordinated fashion -- requires steps to ensure that relief-aid reaches all affected areas in a timely and equitable manner. And that was the primary objective of RISEPAK.
Initially, during the first few months after formation RISEPAK was a "big success", says Sarah Zaidi, the current project coordinator under whose leadership the project now runs.
In fact so successful was this initiative initially that it even received the "prestigious" award for its innovative use of web-based communication at the Stockholm Challenge in 2006. "This project demonstrated the ability of ICT tools to respond rapidly and across a broad base to major disasters. RISEPAK rapidly provided all relief agencies with basic information on the villages and regions that they would be working in, and then provided the tools for the villages and NGOs to feed new information back into the system, which organizes and redistributes it to enable faster responses and better planning of resource," said Earl Mardle, the chairman of jury of the Stockholm Challenge.
The ten-year old Stockholm Challenge is a well established global networking program for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) entrepreneurs. One of contribution of this organization is its ICT prize, the Stockholm Challenge Award., which encourages the use of ICT for improving living conditions and increase economic growth in all parts of the world.
However, despite international recognition, RISEPAK faces possible extinction. "The interest from the public, NGOs and multilaterals in using this portal is dying out now," says Zaidi. "Although it is still sustained by people who launched the portal and who are still keeping it going, its future is only mapped out only until May 2008. After that, I don't know what the future of RISEPAK is to be."
According to a recent report by the World Bank -- one of its founding supporters (something which was not initially public information) -- a big reason why RISEPAK faces the risk of closure is that it lacks continued engagement.
"Some 53 agencies, both national and international, were initially persuaded to provide information on their activities. They appear to have
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.