Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

The Semi-Private Lottery



July 31, 2012 By

Early this year, the Illinois Lottery trotted out a new commercial: A giant red ball rolled through the streets of Chicago, into small towns and then through the farmlands of downstate, while a sonorous voiceover intoned, “No one has small dreams, especially in Illinois. And this year, we’ll have more winners, and more millionaires, across our beautiful state… The new, bigger, better Powerball.”

This is the revamped edition of the Illinois Lottery, under new management, promoted by new ad agencies, and, its managers hope, able to draw a new and much bigger stream of revenue. Last year, Illinois became the first state in the nation to semi-privatize its lottery operations, contracting with a management consortium, Northstar Lottery, to run things on a day-to-day basis. The state is hoping that this experiment will help it win the fiscal jackpot.

“What Illinois has done is a first for the U.S. lottery market,” says James Kilsby of GamblingCompliance, an online research service that tracks the gaming industry.

So far, things look relatively good. This week, the Illinois Lottery released its sales figures for fiscal year 2012: According to the lottery, its sales topped $2.67 billion and transferred a record $708.6 million to K-12 public schools, the capital projects fund for roads and bridges, and targeted causes such as breast cancer research and Illinois veterans’ assistance.

This unaudited figure reflects a 17.9 percent sales increase from fiscal year 2011, according to the lottery, with a 27 percent rise in sales of instant tickets, to $1.62 billion. It’s below the target that Northstar set when it took over in 2011, but Illinois officials seem satisfied.

Shifting the Risk

Other states are looking on with interest. Faced with a persistently rocky economy, and budgets straining at the seams, a number of them may soon follow the Illinois example. Partial privatization of lottery services is attractive to states looking to quickly develop new games, leverage technology — and shift the risks to the private sector. “This is a way that lotteries are looking at boosting sales,” says Kilsby, “without having to expend state resources.”

“If you look at the amount of dollars that are returned to the various programs funded by Illinois, you have to say it’s a resounding success,” says Rebecca Hargrove, president and CEO of the Tennessee Education Lottery Corporation.

Overall, lottery sales across the nation are growing. But so too are the states’ demands for more revenue. The growth in revenues generated by lottery receipts is increasing at a much slower pace than state spending, says Lucy Dadayan of the Rockefeller School of Government. In recent years, lotteries have not been a reliable and sustainable source of revenue for funding K-12 education or other services. “Lotteries are not recession proof,” Dadayan says.

The Illinois Lottery managers became convinced that the way to remedy this was to start all over again with new products and in search of a different clientele. “If you’re really hoping to create something new,” says Illinois Lottery Superintendent Michael Jones, “your interest is in… attracting a new group of people. That alchemy of creating games people want to play, with prizes people want to win, with advertising creating brands people want to participate in, that alchemy hasn’t existed in a long time.’’

What Illinois has created is known technically as an “integrative services contract.” The state continues to own the enterprise but contracts out day-to-day management. Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma have all explored going the semi-privatization route.

Pennsylvania is perhaps furthest along in the process. It has already set up a procurement process and requested qualifications from potential bidders. An undisclosed number of bidders was certified in May.

“We’re not talking about privatizing the lottery; we’re not talking about selling the lottery,” says Pennsylvania Lottery press secretary Elizabeth Brassell. “We’re talking about engaging a private manager to bring industry expertise and private sector innovation ... and ultimately increase the bottom line.”

Several states, including Tennessee, Texas, Kentucky and Georgia, have turned their state lotteries into corporations. These corporate state lotteries are still subject to open records and open meetings, according to Tennessee’s Hargrove, who once ran the Illinois State Lottery. “It’s a states’ rights issue,” Hargrove says, “and every state will take a different approach.”

None of the states are looking to fully privatize lottery operations because they are legally barred from doing so. A 2008 ruling from the Department of Justice prohibits states from turning their entire lottery program over to a private company.

One state, Indiana, actually did launch an early effort at full privatization.  In 2007, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels tried to make a deal with a private gaming company that would have granted the state an upfront payment of $1 billion, according to gambling law expert Joseph Kelly, of the State University at Buffalo in New York. When the Justice Department ruling came down, Daniels dropped plans to privatize.

Illinois’ partial privatization plan has cleared Justice, opening the door for similar experiments. But Kelly says that states should tread carefully with privatization.

Minimizing Greed

“Here’s the big problem I see,” Kelly says. “Are we only interested in maximizing profits? With the [state-run] system, you have a lot of procedures to protect the vulnerable and minimize people’s vulnerability to greed. You’d be able to stop any kind of lottery ad... You have to have strict state supervision.”

Under Illinois’ 10-year-agreement with Northstar, the state retains full ownership of lottery assets and control over all aspects of the operation, including approval of annual business plans. Northstar, meanwhile, is responsible for sales, marketing and game development, technology and the procurement of supporting services. “The state is making sure we have the right team in place to maximize revenue and hit its goals in an ethical, socially responsible manner,” lottery superintendent Jones says.

Northstar earns yearly management fees to cover overhead and supplier costs. It also gets an annual compensation incentive of up to 5 percent of the net income earned by the state and must make shortfall payments of up to 5 percent if it fails to meet projected guarantees it made to the state. For the 2012 fiscal year, it appears to be short of its target.

Despite this shortfall, Illinois officials see the climbing numbers as evidence that their scheme is going to succeed. “This is a work in progress,” Jones says. “They missed their targets. Can they make their targets? I think we can have confidence that they can.”

Stateline is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news service of the Pew Center on the States that provides daily reporting and analysis on trends in state policy.


| More

Comments

Mark    |    Commented August 2, 2012

Stop predatory Gambling (http://stoppredatorygambling.org/category/research-center/lotteries-who-really-plays/) has many articles about the crime perpetrated on the poor by the government selling lottery tickets. A few facts from various studies on their site: 1) Poor households, with annual take-home incomes under $13,000, on average, spend $645 a year on lottery tickets, which comes to about 9% of their yearly income. 2) 38% of those who earn less than $25,000 point to the lottery as the most effective and practical strategy for accumulating several hundred thousand dollars. 3) In South Carolina African-Americans made up 19% of the state’s adult population but accounted for almost 39% of frequent players; people in households earning under $40,000 accounted for 28% of the state’s population but made up 54% percent of frequent players; people with no high school diploma accounted for 8% of the state’s population and 21% of frequent players; and people whose highest educational achievement is a high school diploma or GED made up 25% of the total population and 34% percent of frequent players. Illinois needs to stop what they are doing, not make it worse!


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All