Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Top 21 Intelligent Communities Nominated for 2013

October 22, 2012 By

Will an American city defend the title of the world’s top Intelligent Community of the Year in 2013?

Three U.S. cities: Columbus, Ohio; Mitchell, S.D.; and Philadelphia were nominated by the Intelligent Community Forum’s (ICF) for next year’s Smart21 list — the top 21 cities worldwide demonstrating best practices in a 21st-century community.

This year, Riverside, Calif., was nominated as Intelligent Community of the Year for its efforts performed through its SmartRiverside program. The official announcement of the Smart 21 cities was made Sunday, Oct. 21, in Riverside.

Selection for the top 21 is based off of nominations submitted from around the world with research conducted by ICF, a think tank that studies the economic and social development of the 21st-century community.

Of the 21 nominees for 2013, 13 cities have made the Smart21 list before, but for the first time since the program began in 2004, communities from Albania and New Zealand have made the list.

So how did Columbus, Mitchell and Philadelphia make the grade?

Louis Zacharilla, cofounder of ICF, said each of the three American cities was nominated over several dozen other American cities during the selection process because each city reflected innovation in the workplace – the overall theme for next year’s program.

“We’re going to be looking at how communities are at least attempting to do what is really important, which is to make sure that technology is not being used to disintermediate employment or to end employment, which it’s very good at doing, and it should do in the private sector, but to actually create opportunities and to create jobs,” Zacharilla said.

He said Mitchell overcame challenges such as a severe population drop (about 30 percent) over a couple of decades, but through a combination of a digital literacy program, building fiber to the home and utilizing technology to improve farming practices — also known as precision farming, the city has managed to transform its local economy.

Philadelphia, a city much different from Mitchell in terms of its culture, dealt with significant economic challenges, particularly since the Great Recession. Zacharilla said the city has begun to move forward with programs that focus on digital literacy and has informed its educational infrastructure to ensure preparedness for the future economy.

For Columbus, turning to its neighboring community Dublin, Ohio, for ideas on best practices is what may have helped it make the Smart21 list, (Dublin made the ICF’s top seven list in 2011). Utilizing universities, broadband infrastructure and the Ohio Super Computer Network, the city has been able to prepare itself for a 21st-century economy.

ICF will later narrow down the list of nominees to a top seven list of intelligent communities and in 2013, the organization will select its top winner.

The full list of nominees :

1.    Ballarat, South Australia, Australia

2.    Castelo de Vide, Portalegre District, Portugal

3.    Columbus, Ohio

4.    Heraklion, Crete, Greece

5.    Hsinchu City, Taiwan

6.    Jiading New City, China

7.    Kingston, Ontario, Canada

8.    Mitchell, S.D.

9.    Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, Finland

10.    Philadelphia

11.    Prospect, South Australia, Australia

12.    Rio de Janeiro

13.    Stratford, Ontario, Canada

14.    Taichung City, Taiwan

15.    Tallinn, Estonia

16.    Taoyuan County, Taiwan

17.    Tirana, Albania

18.    Toronto

19.    Wanganui, New Zealand

20.    Whittlesea, Victoria, Australia

21.    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

| More


Steve Reneker    |    Commented October 23, 2012

Congratulations Smart 21, you all have proved to the world that you are the best in broadband, digitial inclusion, knowledge workforce, innovation and advocacy in the world. Your communtiies will be ones that businesses and citizens will want to move to. Great Job!!!!!!

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All