Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

U.S. To Aggressively Test Wireless Safety Devices for Underground Mines



February 7, 2006 By

Rescue photo from MSHA Sago mine disaster briefing.

Following the Sago coal mine explosion in Tallmansville, West Virginia, where 12 trapped miners died in the worst mine disaster in that state since 1968, U.S. experts have started to assess how new wireless technologies might mitigate such incidents in the future.

The U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) announced this month that it is evaluating and testing a personal emergency device (PED) and a locator system for underground mines. CONSOL Energy and Peabody Coal Company have agreed to work with MSHA to test the systems.

"MSHA is moving quickly and aggressively to evaluate technology that may help save the lives of miners in this nation," David G. Dye, acting assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health said in a release. "We will test these systems -- as well as other promising technologies that arise -- to provide miners and mine operators with useful data on the effectiveness of devices such as these in making mines safer workplaces."

The PED was developed in Australia by Mine Site Technologies. The system uses either a surface- or an underground-powered loop which radiates a radio frequency signal enabling one-way communication to underground. The system dims and flashes a miner's cap lamp for about 10 seconds, then sends a text message to the wearer. Individual, group or broadcast messages can be sent.

MSHA is currently surveying underground mines around the U.S. that use the PED to determine its effectiveness and discuss operational issues that have arisen in different mine environments. Of particular concern are the issues created by the underground antenna loop and the need to withdraw power in the event of a fire or explosion.

Mine Site Technologies was previously issued MSHA approval for their Model PED1 Paging Receiver/Cap Lamp, meaning that this system may be marketed in the U.S. for use in underground gassy atmospheres. According to Department of Labor spokesman, Dirk Fillpot, further testing of the device by the department is intended to ascertain the effectiveness and safety in emergency situations, including the potential for damage to the receivers by fire, explosion or roof falls which could compromise the ability to track and/or send messages on the data line.

The MSHA is also evaluating a locator system (Tracker IV) from the same company. This system enables identification of a miner's location in an underground mine. The miner wears a transmitter that sends out a unique pulsed signal to receiver beacons strategically spaced underground. MSHA will be looking at possible concerns. While the Tracker IV units have received MSHA approval, the beacons have not, in part because the beacons might be subject to damage from fire or explosions. This could compromise the ability to track or send messages. The company suggests that this might be handled by placing the beacons in explosion proof boxes.

One other concern for the tracking units is that tracking of personnel is limited to identifying their location in the "zone" between two beacons where any given transmitter is located. Therefore, if the beacons are spaced (as commonly done in other mines) at 3000' intervals, a signal is received when the transmitter passes beacon A, but then not again until it passes beacon B. If the system is disrupted in an emergency and personnel need to be located, this limitation would create a potential search window of over


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All