|
- Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Digital Communities
Industry Members
Using the Internet to Physically Harm
April 16, 2008 By Gina M. Scott
Near the end of March an historic first took place: people were deliberately physically harmed through the Internet. In what sounds like an episode of the Outer Limits, unknown people maliciously posted JavaScript images and animations designed to trigger seizures in people with photosensitive epilepsy to the message boards of the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site.
This is not a first to be proud of.
This was not your typical Web site hack. People were the target, not the information contained on the site. The bright colored, flashing animations caused people to freeze, get migraines or have full-on seizures. But hack is a misnomer. The people who carried out this attack can not be called hackers because there was little if any computer skill involved. Practically anyone can go to a message board and upload an image. Coordination, perhaps. Skill, not really.
For the most part people condemned the act as heinous -- nothing more than a cheap shot. Yet some people found it funny. Many people left the comment LULZ -- a slang term meaning "laugher at another's expense," or "just for the hell of it." Those who find humor in cruelty would probably go around tripping elderly people for a laugh -- but what if it was their grandmother?
One person suggested that people with epilepsy should just not use computers. What a great idea. Perhaps they could go back to strictly snail mail and phones. They don't need jobs --who uses computers at work? Shutting people away from society is not an option.
The Internet is no longer just an encyclopedia replacement. Web 2.0 advancements have allowed us all to connect and share our lives online. The Epilepsy Foundation's forums are a perfect example of such connections. These forums, and the like, give people anonymity and the freedom to ask the questions they might be otherwise scared to ask since epilepsy still carries with it the stigma of thousands of years of misunderstanding. The forums give millions of people a chance to discuss questions about the disorder, medication options, different ways of controlling seizures and how to explain Epilepsy to friends and family. Not to mention the emotional support one gains by talking to people in similar situations.
So why attack it?
If someone attacked a political site because they disagreed with the position that would be one thing (it would still be wrong, but at least there would be a reason). What was the purpose of attacking a non-profit site and those seeking help? Does some group have something against people with epilepsy? Most likely not. This is not the dark ages. People with epilepsy are no longer believed to be demon possessed. But they were a vulnerable target. Like the many snickering LULZ comments, this was probably just some stupid prank meant to cause a media stir. Maybe they did it for kicks, to see if they could.
Hopefully all the attention from this attack will create better understanding of epilepsy. But it looks likes times have changed and we must not only worry about online scammers stealing identities, or emptying bank accounts -- we have to worry about assault.
In Our Library
- Are You Sure You Are Maximizing the Value of Your Microsoft SharePoint Investment?
- The Microsoft SharePoint platform provides a wealth of opportunities for any organization to streamline business processes and expand knowledge sharing; however most government organizations struggle to take advantage of these opportunities.
- Hurricane Preparedness
- Make sure you are prepared for hurricane season before it is here. Join in this Digital Communities teleconference and gain insight on how to prepare from experts who have been on the ground during major hurricanes.
- Government-to-Government IT Services: What Works and What's Left to Work Out
- This paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption. View All
Latest From Digital Communities Features
Subscribe to Digital Communities
Digital Communities (DC) is e.Republic‘s local government program. The particular strength of DC is its focus on encouraging collaboration and creating productive relationships between and among cities, counties, regions and select private sector companies uniquely positioned to help improve the delivery of public services.
Subscribe | View Digital Issue
Government Best Practices
Featured White Papers & Reports
Government-to-Government IT Services: What Works and What's Left to Work OutThis Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.
View Full Library
Events
Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.
Epilepsy made the news. I just wish the media would be a bit more helpful on reporting the trouble people are having on the new FDA approved Dilantin and what it has been doing to our bodies.
Epilepsy made the news. I just wish the media would be a bit more helpful on reporting the trouble people are having on the new FDA approved Dilantin and what it has been doing to our bodies.
Epilepsy made the news. I just wish the media would be a bit more helpful on reporting the trouble people are having on the new FDA approved Dilantin and what it has been doing to our bodies.
I think it is horrible that people think it is funny to cause harm to others. Epilepsy is serious and many do not understand that posting a message can harm others. I think before people make fun of a situation they should put themselves in others shoes. Very good article.
I think it is horrible that people think it is funny to cause harm to others. Epilepsy is serious and many do not understand that posting a message can harm others. I think before people make fun of a situation they should put themselves in others shoes. Very good article.
I think it is horrible that people think it is funny to cause harm to others. Epilepsy is serious and many do not understand that posting a message can harm others. I think before people make fun of a situation they should put themselves in others shoes. Very good article.
I wonder if the act of posting with intent to cause harm reaches the level of an assualt or disorderly conduct. It would seem to reach the level in which someone could be sued.
I wonder if the act of posting with intent to cause harm reaches the level of an assualt or disorderly conduct. It would seem to reach the level in which someone could be sued.
I wonder if the act of posting with intent to cause harm reaches the level of an assualt or disorderly conduct. It would seem to reach the level in which someone could be sued.
Why don't we go for attempted murder? Easily could have happened. Since this would most likely be a criminal matter, no Class Action Status...but I ask you, if someone had done something even half as offensive on another (pick a "sexy" non-for-profit) site, it would be on the cover of the NY Times.
Why don't we go for attempted murder? Easily could have happened. Since this would most likely be a criminal matter, no Class Action Status...but I ask you, if someone had done something even half as offensive on another (pick a "sexy" non-for-profit) site, it would be on the cover of the NY Times.
Why don't we go for attempted murder? Easily could have happened. Since this would most likely be a criminal matter, no Class Action Status...but I ask you, if someone had done something even half as offensive on another (pick a "sexy" non-for-profit) site, it would be on the cover of the NY Times.
Visiting the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site, it appears you have to create a personal profile to be able to contribute content. Were they unable to identify or track those responsible?
Visiting the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site, it appears you have to create a personal profile to be able to contribute content. Were they unable to identify or track those responsible?
Visiting the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site, it appears you have to create a personal profile to be able to contribute content. Were they unable to identify or track those responsible?