Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Virginia Accelerates Telework Program


April 25, 2006 By

Reprinted from Stateline.org.

Traffic congestion -- a hot issue in Virginia -- has driven lawmakers to shift the state's telecommuting initiative into overdrive, challenging government managers to allow at least 25 percent of eligible employees to work from home.

Telecommuting, or telework, is considered a win-win for state governments. Employees avoid grueling commutes and high fuel costs; states realize healthier, more productive workers, better air quality, lower office space expenses, and less traffic congestion.

Governors have promoted telework initiatives -- a policy almost no one opposes -- as a way to allow state workers to spend more time with their families and communities, improving the quality of life for everyone.

Here is a state-by-state breakdown of telework programs.

At least 34 states have adopted telework programs in selected agencies and regions. Six -- Georgia, Kentucky, Virginia, Oregon, Florida and Texas -- offer the flexible work option to employees in all agencies throughout the state.

But despite politicians' efforts, government managers have been slow to offer the work-at-home option, in part because it requires a change in their management styles, said Chuck Wilsker of The Telework Coalition.

As in the federal government's telework program, most state initiatives call on managers to designate employees who can work from home one or more days a week. But without rigorous guidelines or sanctions, reluctant managers tend to offer the option to only a handful of employees.

Last year, Virginia lawmakers -- desperate to alleviate worsening road congestion -- turned the tables on government managers. Instead of identifying employees who are eligible for telework, they asked managers to designate those not eligible.

Virginia's new statute assumes that all government employees are candidates for working at home, and calls on managers to explain why they aren't. By 2009, the state wants at least one in four eligible workers off the roads one or more days a week.

"For a start, nurses who turn patients and wardens who guard prisoners aren't eligible," says program director Sara Wilson of Virginia's human resources department.

But nearly all other categories of employees -- even college professors -- are candidates for alternative work arrangements, including flexible schedules to avoid rush hour traffic, four-day work weeks, and working at home, she said.

Virginia launched its telework campaign in 2002, but out of more than 127,000 state workers, fewer than 1,000 are teleworking, according to state reports.

To accelerate the program, last year's law put the human resources department in charge of coaching managers in all agencies to make the "culture" changes needed to meet the state's ambitious goals.

"I'm trying to tee up our managers to think about telework in different ways," Wilson said. "It's not just about transportation and air pollution. We want to be an employer of choice. ... The ability to work at home is a big draw."

Another way to persuade managers to embrace telework, Wilson said, is to ask how they plan to operate if large numbers of employees are quarantined during a pandemic, or can't get to work because of a disaster.

Teleworkers have the equipment and telecommunications services in place to continue working during a natural disaster, terrorist attack, or extreme weather conditions, she said.

Georgia's telework director, Dorothy Gordon, says a typical reason managers offer employees the work-at-home option is to free them from office distractions, such as ringing phones and garrulous colleagues, when time-sensitive projects need to be completed.

Studies show that when employees work from home, absenteeism and sick leave drop dramatically. In addition, employees -- grateful for


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All