May 2, 2006 By Chad Vander Veen
In the passenger cabin, hundreds of somnolent people in close quarters try to find a comfortable sleeping position. The return trip from Southeast Asia is long, and getting some shut-eye is the only way to bear it.
Drifting off proves difficult because somewhere aboard the mammoth airliner, a passenger is stricken with a terrible cough. After a while, a wave of relief washes over the rest of the cabin as the passenger falls asleep and the coughing ceases.
Hours later, the plane lands in Los Angeles and passengers begin exiting the plane. As travelers in the front clear the way, passengers in the rear begin to move forward -- except one. The languid passenger has not stirred from his seat.
Fear and confusion spread as the remaining passengers wonder if they too will contract whatever illness the now-deceased cougher brought on board.
Currently, should the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discover passengers were exposed to a deadly pathogen, tracking down each individual is a matter of collecting hand-scribbled customs declarations, discarded passenger manifests and seat assignment lists that the airline might maintain for only a day or two. As multiple viruses continue to make headlines, many fear this traditional strategy of contacting passengers is too slow to stop an outbreak.
In response, the CDC is proposing a new method of electronically tracking airline passengers.
Airlines have always kept records of their passengers. The most common data is the passenger manifests and customs declarations. Airlines tend to hold such information for a very limited time, however -- usually less than a week. In addition, this data is likely to be handwritten and often illegible, which can make analysis a long and painstaking process.
"We're aware that the old methods of trying to piece together records by hand may be too time consuming if you've got a large-scale outbreak like you had with SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome]," said Katherine Andrus, assistant general counsel for the Air Transport Association (ATA). "So the prospect of some sort of electronic transfer of that data is something that has been discussed for the last three years."
With the looming threat of avian influenza, or bird flu, the CDC announced a proposal to change federal rules on passenger tracking and quarantine procedures in November 2005. The current rules have been unchanged for 25 years, and federal officials felt the time had come to update them. In the past, the CDC manually tracked airline passengers possibly exposed to a communicable disease while onboard an airplane to inform them of where to be treated and whether they would need to be quarantined.
Speaking in a press tele-briefing, Dr. Marty Cetron, director of the CDC's Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, outlined the proposed changes.
The modifications would require airlines to maintain passenger manifests in electronic form for 60 days after passengers land, said Cetron. As part of the plan, passenger information must be turned over in less than one day if requested by health officials -- preferably within 12 hours. In addition, the information must be provided electronically and must include specific fields, such as passenger manifests and seat assignments, for effective "contact tracing."
Contact tracing is the process by which public health officials track down passengers who may have been exposed to a communicable disease.
Elements such as passenger manifests, customs declarations and seat assignments are useful in finding and contacting a passenger only if the data is in good condition and can be gathered in time. Presently it can take days of work to identify, locate and contact passengers.
The SARS outbreak three years ago exposed
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.