Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Web 2.0 and Citizen Engagement


September 24, 2008 By

We hear the term "Web 2.0" everywhere. For many, it's mostly associated with YouTube, Facebook and MySpace. However, like any term that develops into hype, the definition seems to expand.

Open source advocate Tim O'Reilly said, "Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform."

The best explanation may come from Wikipedia: "Web 2.0 Web sites allow users to do more than just retrieve information. They can build on the interactive facilities of 'Web 1.0' to provide 'network as platform' computing, allowing users to run software applications entirely through a browser. ... These sites may have an 'architecture of participation' that encourages users to add value to the application as they use it."

Web 2.0 offers vast opportunities for local government to organize and interact with citizens. However, it presents new challenges to government's customary approach to citizen engagement and leadership.

Ten years ago, government could usually get ahead of the news story by managing the news cycle. Fast-forward to the world of Web 2.0 and the reality of de facto "citizen journalists." If there's Internet access after a large disaster, videos, blogs or photos will likely be on the Net within hours, if not minutes. How does government keep up with information online that solidifies people's opinions, and also possibly influences their actions?

Local government must embrace Web 2.0 technologies because they offer new ways to interactively engage citizens as partners in action.

In this issue, we examine some Web 2.0 implications for government and explore the possibilities to enhance community and local government service to citizen.

While discussing media and community in general, we also offer a take on changing media ownership rules, which some say could seriously impact locally owned and operated community media. Examples of regional cooperation on IT projects, an option many communities will investigate in the future, are also discussed.

These articles reflect how we're expanding digital communities beyond what's traditionally been viewed as the wired community. It's safe to say a digital community is one that embraces Web 2.0 possibilities, creating innovative ways for citizens to interact with government.

Improving citizen service has been a fundamental driver for IT in local government over the 20 years. With Web 2.0, we step beyond the service paradigm by essentially adding another layer: government as a platform for community-citizen interaction and cooperation in ways yet imagined.

And that makes the future of digital communities very exciting.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All