Government Technology

White House Cyber-Security Adviser Melissa Hathaway Steps Down



August 4, 2009 By

According to White House officials, cyber-security adviser Melissa Hathaway has stepped down from her post as a senior cyber-security aide at the White House. The resignation, however, will not go into effect until August 21.

The Washington Post reports that the decision to resign was due, in part, to President Barack Obama's delay in appointing a cyber-security coordinator. In a speech on the importance of cyber-security, Obama pledged to personally select a cyber-security coordinator.

Hathaway recently said that she wasn't willing to continue to wait any longer, because she wasn't empowered to drive the change, according to the newspaper. She said she can do more from a different role.

Hathaway played a leading role in coordinating the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative started by the George W. Bush administration. She also led the Obama administration's 60-day review of cyber-policy earlier this year and was considered a leading contender to permanently fill the cyber-security post. According to The Wall Street Journal, she lost favor with the president's economic team after she said it should consider options for regulating some private-sector entities to ensure they secure their networks.

"We've made a lot of progress in the last 30 months that I've been in government, and now it's time to move on," said Hathaway, as reported by The Washington Post. "It's up to the administration to take the next step."


| More

Comments

Anonymous    |    Commented August 4, 2009

she is right - unless they are forced to do it by - they won;'t and they place the country and its citizens under exposure to harm -- why does the gov tell me "the little guy" to buckle up or get fined and not tell "big business" the same with their networks?

Anonymous    |    Commented August 4, 2009

she is right - unless they are forced to do it by - they won;'t and they place the country and its citizens under exposure to harm -- why does the gov tell me "the little guy" to buckle up or get fined and not tell "big business" the same with their networks?

Anonymous    |    Commented August 4, 2009

she is right - unless they are forced to do it by - they won;'t and they place the country and its citizens under exposure to harm -- why does the gov tell me "the little guy" to buckle up or get fined and not tell "big business" the same with their networks?


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Public Safety 2019
Motorola conducted an industry survey on the latest trends in public safety communications. The results provide an outlook of what technology is in store for your agency in the next five years. Download the results to gain this valuable insight.
Improving Emergency Response with Digital Communications
Saginaw County, Mich., increases interoperability, communication and collaboration with a digital voice and data network, as well as modern computer-aided dispatch.
Reduce Talk Time in Your Support Center by 40%
As the amount of information available to citizens and employees grows each year, so do customer expectations for efficient service. Contextual Knowledge makes information easy to find, dropping resolution times and skyrocketing satisfaction.
View All

Featured Papers