March 4, 2014 By Robert Bell
The digital era offers many challenges: from trying to remember all your passwords to realizing how few of your fellow citizens can hope to earn a living wage without knowing how to work a computer. The challenges feel personal and they are –but they also challenge the life of the community, sometimes in unexpected ways.
In small towns across the United States, today’s challenge is to “go digital or go dark.” No, it is not about smart streetlights. It is about movie theaters, or cinemas most of the world calls them. In many small to midsize cities, the movie theater is a heritage building constructed as a palace of entertainment ages ago. It is more than a place to watch films. In places far from the hotbeds of culture, it is a cultural touchstone and a symbol of civilization. A lot of people care about it and want to see it survive.
The future of those theaters, however, is in doubt, according to a New York Times article by Paul Post. The major movie studios have started announcing that they will no longer distribute movies to theaters on 35-millimeter film. Paramount was the first, with The Wolf of Wall Street, but others have announced the same goal. Producing and shipping a 35-millimeter print to a single theater costs US$2,000. A digital drive containing the film can get there for one-tenth the cost, and satellite or online distribution is cheaper still.
To show digital films, however, theaters need digital projectors – and it costs $60,000 to $70,000 to install just one. Hence the problem for a place like the Palace Theater of Lake Placid in New York State, which opened in 1926. As a small theater with four screens, it had no hope of being able to find the $260,000 needed to make the conversion. The owners, Reginald and Barbara Clark, who bought the business in 1961, were facing its end.
Facing its end, that is, until people in Lake Placid heard the news. Friends and neighbors began organizing and succeeded in raising enough money to buy one projector. The Clarkes’ extended family pitched in to buy and install a second one.
A regional nonprofit, the Adirondack North Country Association, launched a “Go Digital or Go Dark” campaign that has raised another $100,000 to continue the conversion. It has raised funds and won grants to help other theaters in other places you have never heard of – Tupper Lake, Indian Lake and Old Forge – make the change.
Like all the great industrial transitions – from water power to steam power, hand-crafting to the assembly line – the digital age giveth and the digital age taketh away. Most of the time, it feels as though we have no choice in the matter. But places like Lake Placid show us otherwise. When they care enough, the people of a community can have a voice about what comes and what goes, and the Intelligent Communities of the world are harnessing that energy today to build a better tomorrow.
February 25, 2014 By Louis Zacharilla
(This is a guest blog by Norman Jacknis) As readers of this blog know, I’ve spent a lot of time in the last few years helping cities figure out the impact of new technologies and broadband in people’s lives and also helping mayors figure out ways of using those technologies to create new kinds of urban experiences and reasons for people to live in their cities.
Cities were the winners out of the industrial age and attracted vast numbers of people from the countryside. You can see that pattern repeating itself today in the newly successful industrial countries, like China, or those areas that are just starting to industrialize, like Africa.
In the already developed countries, even though the change from the industrial to the knowledge economy has been wrenching for many cities, urban areas are still ahead of the game by comparison with rural areas and cities are better positioned to take advantage of these changes.
In theory, though, the global Internet and the increased availability of inexpensive technology should have had an even greater impact on rural areas. For if it were really true that people can work anywhere and quality of life becomes the key factor in where they choose to live, then many people would choose to live in the countryside and not in the more metropolitan regions.
It hasn’t happened that way. As you can read from my post last week which, among other trends, noted that telecommuting has increased dramatically among urban residents, but not for those in exurbia.
There are many reasons why the countryside hasn’t realized its potential. Partly, this is a residue of the industrial age – it is not yet true for everyone that they can take their work with them. For many without college educations, making a living requires a commute to a manufacturing plant or a service location.
As has been true for declining urban areas, we see in some rural communities a social pathology sets in that reinforces decline and is evidenced in the increased use of drugs and other forms societal breakdown. Even though it wouldn’t be called a pathology, the out-migration of many of their young adults has also been a concern of the remaining residents of rural areas.
Another part of the story is that many rural communities have not yet become fully connected to the global economy. In his recent rural strategy announcements, President Obama pointed out that there is a 15% gap in broadband between urban and rural households. Many technology providers have ignored rural communities. That should change. Rural communities are all too often ignored by urban dwellers and far too many people are not fully aware of the far reaching potential that 21st century technology offers rural communities.
While cities will still be attractive, they are not for everyone all the time. Many people would indeed prefer to live in the countryside if they had economic opportunity, decent health care, a means to learn and in other ways overcome the sense of isolation that has historically been the downside of rural living.
Many countries have come to realize that they cannot just move all of their rural residents into cities. As India has learned, there is not enough economic opportunity in their cities and the urban infrastructure cannot support the migrants who have already moved there. The New York Times recently reported that, even the Chinese, with a relentless urban focus, have started to worry that their nation’s traditional culture and identity is getting lost in the process. Indeed, there has been a reverse migration from the cities to the Chinese countryside.
None of this is a surprise to those who live in rural communities. What may be better news is that there is now an imperative to bring technology and global connectivity to the countryside – and to help them build those communities into attractive and sustainable places for people to stay and to return to.
We’ve seen this in President Obama’s rural broadband program and in the recently announced Canadian rural broadband investment of $305 million.
With this background, the Intelligent Community Forum started its Rural Imperative program last year. It will apply to the world’s rural areas the Intelligent Community Forum’s unique, global perspective on how broadband and technology can be mutually reinforcing with community development and growth. This is an important step in helping the new connected countryside go from potential possibility to a reality.
February 20, 2014 By John Jung
Well, not quite yet, but as my colleague Robert Bell reminded me last September, that in 2015, we will see the 20th anniversary of a major event that took place in 1995 in Toronto, called SMART95, the very first gathering in the world of telecommunications engineers, architects, planners, sociologists, mayors and CIOs to learn about “Smart People, Smart Building and Smart Cities”.
According to Networked Communities, written by Sylvie Albert, Don M. Flournoy and Rolland LeBrasseur, “the first true ‘intelligent communities event’, which linked the emerging telecommunications revolution and the fledgling Internet to economic development, was held in Toronto, Canada, in 1995. This event, called “SMART95,” for the first time, saw the telecommunications industry and the world of urban planners, political policy makers and economic development officials gathered under one roof to examine the impact of telecommunications on communities and economies.”
February 5, 2014 By Robert Bell
In 2013, the people of Kenya sent each other US$19.6 billion in payments and money transfers. According to Herbert Wattanga, author of Nairobi County’s Smart21 nomination, the total of their transactions exceeded Kenya’s national budget by more than $1 billion. And guess what? Not one of those transactions went through a bank. Instead, all of them went through mobile phones.
At ICF, we write a lot about the impact of the broadband revolution on every aspect of our lives, and about the urgent need it creates for cities and regions to adapt to its demands. You would be hard-pressed to find a better example than mobile banking in Kenya – even though it uses a technology many years older than smartphones.
In 2007, a mobile carrier called Safaricom introduced a new money transfer service called M-Pesa. Up to that point, banking in Kenya was largely controlled by foreign banks, which tended to serve only the most affluent Kenyans. Then the central bank rewrote its regulations in an attempt to expand access to financial services. One new regulation allowed mobile operators like Safaricom to provide mobile payments.
Safaricom’s move was meant to be business-as-usual: a new service that would help reduce customer churn. It allowed users to load money onto their phones through the same process they used to prepay for airtime. Money was moved with a simple text message, with each transfer incurring a fee of between $0.25 and $0.70. The money deposited was held, not by banks, but in an independent trust that Safaricom does not control.
So if you ever wonder what all the fuss about broadband is really about, M-Pesa offers a clue. Sure, it’s not broadband – but it is a revolution in online applications. It makes clear that the same technology bringing you you cute cat videos and spam in your inbox can profoundly change lives – but only in places that are prepared to seize the benefits technology offers.
January 28, 2014 By Louis Zacharilla
Passion is so much a part of motivation. So is pride. A genuine sense of both filled the massive ballroom in the Millenium Hotel in Taichung last week as I named two new entrants from Taiwan (Hsinchu City & New Taipei City) to the ranks of the world’s Top7. Along with them were named five others from Canada and the USA. As you can see from the news report on FTV News out of Taipei, the place erupted when the names of its two “hometown nation” finalists appeared. (For the record, there was even robust applause for Columbus and Toronto. I learned later that it was coming from people in the room who have an ICF alumni relationship in Columbus, and young people who have lived in Toronto.) The Smart21 also received one more deserved round of applause from a group of 300 community business leaders, academic, students and Mayor Hu’s administration.
It was a moving three days in Taichung. I again saw a community and a nation that few see, or bother to look for when considering Taiwan. For most of the world and the media, it is “All China all the time.” Not here. Not within the Intelligent Community movement. It is my prediction that China may look a lot more like Taichung someday than Taichung will look like China. China is rushing to understand ICF’s “Wisdom Communities,” as they call them. Good for them. Perhaps they too will soon understand what is at the heart of an Intelligent Community: great communities thriving on the construction of creative, clever, open industries and local governance. As Taichung Mayor Hu said in his keynote, “Smart cities do not do foolish things.”
Taichung has certainly not fallen victim to foolishness. At least not yet. Why do I like this place so much? Because it has a soul and, as my father used to say, it knows how to use its head. In my keynote address (titled “Brain Gain: Creating the Cities of the Future with only 1300 grams.”) I quoted tech investor Paul Graham, who said of that California phenomenon, Silicon Valley, that “for all its power, Silicon Valley has a great weakness. It has soul-crushing urban sprawl.” When a money guy like Graham refers to a “soul-crushing” experience I pay attention because it begins to reinforce my belief that a community with creative courage looks at itself as an artist looks at a blank canvas.
In traditional Taiwanese culture incense means longevity. When incense is invoked in art here it is meant to symbolize the extension of today’s efforts into eternity. This was the ancients’ way of suggesting sustainability of purpose and person through good work and a long-range view. When applied to the development of an economy and a community it is the ultimate, unmeasured, distance between a powerful, rich and merely “smart” place, and theTaichungs and Eindhovens, whose wealth will be more rounded but immense.
For sure Taichung has a heart and soul. It is big and deep, and is accelerating into the future a remarkable economic engine hungry for more talent to drive it. Culture is at the heart of the new strategy. Taichung has a Cultural and Creative Industries Park upon which it seeks to “build industries on the foundation of local culture.” It is not mere Party sloganeering either. Yes, I am typing this on an ACER laptop, which was made here in Taiwan, as are at least 70% of the world’s notebooks. And yes, Taichung is a monstrously successful manufacturer of precision machinery of the high-tech kind. And yes, the real estate industry, which underwrote the Top7 Day events here is booming, and there is no end to the potential of this place. You cannot go three minutes in either direction without seeing construction. People are getting rich here – but not flashing it. And yes, they continue to create more wealth. They are proud of that and loving it. They are also developing another type of wealth that is at the heart of civilization and essential to sustainability.
That “wealth” is made from a community which has a policy for excavating, innovating upon and using ICT to nurture local culture. This is the big idea here. Taiwan president Ma must have heard my father’s phrase because during a recent trip to Africa, Mr. Ma (former Mayor of Taipei) told his guests that despite a lack of natural resources, “we in Taiwan dig into our brains.” The story of Taichung’s success is about that. It is a new idea that has persisted her for nearly ten years. It places dual emphasis on culture mining and environmental stewardship. Its Calligraphy Greenway project won the first prize in the LivCom Awards program in, of all places, China. The project has transformed an entire swath of the city.
During the Top7 Announcement dinner, a really hot jazz band with an unusual number of saxophones was blowing away. Why so many saxes, I asked? I learned that Taichung is the world’s largest exporter of jazz saxophones, which they produce for private label brands worldwide. Industrial output of this type is a part of the overall strategy. This jazz was also reflective of the fact that a lot creative riffing is going on. Some of it is massive. Taichung is rushing to complete a new opera house, the brainchild of Mayor Jason Hu and the famed Japanese architect Toyo Ito. It will be the most physically interesting place in Asia to watch people die dramatic deaths, courtesy of the genius of Italian composers! It is also an ode to the future of democracy. Like the idea behind New York’s Central Park, its massive outdoor park and public spaces within are odes to a place emerging as a strong democracy. Democracy and a sense of fairness have taken root, and the result is a fusion of East and West at its best. What a place!
American columnist Thomas Friedman has written that with the exception of the USA, Taiwan is his favorite country. I get it. Among the many places I comfortably call “home” among the 126 Intelligent Communities of the world , this place, Taichung, has a special place in my heart. I am happy for them. The “Mechanical Kingdom” has become the Kingdom of the Intelligent Community.
As the Year of the Horse races toward Asia, we acknowledge seven communities, two from tiny Taiwan, who are out of the gate and running toward the 21st Century by using ICT and, yes, heart and soul to let their incense continue to rise. Good luck to them all - and thank you again, Taichung!
About the Intelligent Community Forum
The Intelligent Community Forum is a think tank that studies the economic and social development of the 21st Century community. Whether in industrialized or developing nations, communities are challenged to create prosperity, stability and cultural meaning in a world where jobs, investment and knowledge increasingly depend on advances in communications. For the 21st Century community, connectivity is a double-edge sword: threatening established ways of life on the one hand, and offering powerful new tools to build prosperous, inclusive and sustainable economies on the other. ICF seeks to share the best practices of the world's Intelligent Communities in adapting to the demands of the Broadband Economy, in order to help communities everywhere find sustainable renewal and growth. More information can be found at www.intelligentcommunity.org.
Robert Bell is co-founder of the Intelligent Community Forum, where he heads its research and content development activities. He is the author of ICF's pioneering study, Benchmarking the Intelligent Community, the annual Top Seven Intelligent Communities of the Year white papers and other research reports issued by the Forum, and of Broadband Economies: Creating the Community of the 21st Century. Mr. Bell has also authored articles in The Municipal Journal of Telecommunications Policy, IEDC Journal, Telecommunications, Asia-Pacific Satellite and Asian Communications; and has appeared in segments of ABC World News and The Discovery Channel. A frequent keynote speaker and moderator at municipal and telecom industry events, he has also led economic development missions and study tours to cities in Asia and the US.
ICF co-founder John G. Jung originated the Intelligent Community concept and continues to serve as the Forum's leading visionary. Formerly President and CEO of the Greater Toronto Marketing Alliance and Calgary Economic Development Authority, he is a registered professional urban planner, urban designer and economic developer. He leads regular international business missions to US, European, Asian, Indian and Australian cities, and originated the ICF Immersion Lab program. John is a regular speaker at universities and conferences and serves as an advisor to regional and national leaders on Intelligent Community development. The author of numerous articles in planning and economic development journals, he has received global and Toronto-based awards for his work in collaboration and strategic development and sits on numerous task forces and international advisory boards.
ICF co-founder Louis Zacharilla is the creator and presenter of the annual Smart21, Top Seven and Intelligent Community Awards and oversees ICF's media communications and development programs. He is a frequent keynote and motivational speaker and panelist, addressing audiences of tech, academic and community leaders around the world, and writes extensively for publications including American City & County, Continental Airline's in-flight magazine and Municipal World. His frequent appearances in the electronic media have included both television and radio in South Korea, China and Canada. He has served as an adjunct professor at Fordham University in New York and is a Guest Lecturer at Polytechnic University's Distinguished Speaker Series. He holds a Masters Degree from the University of Notre Dame.