Government Technology

GPS Bracelets to Track Juveniles in Multnomah County, Ore.



October 11, 2010 By

To keep tabs on gangs in Multnomah County, Ore., the Department of Community Justice is moving beyond basic ankle bracelets to devices that can pinpoint exact locations in real time.

The county Board of Commissioners approved nearly $10,000 as part of $117,000 in emergency anti-gang funds for a five-month pilot program, where five youths affiliated with gangs will wear GPS bracelets, The Oregonian reported. The department hopes the technology will provide an advantage in preventing crime and gang activity, but according to the newspaper, some civil libertarians and youth advocates have concerns about teen rights and “a disparate impact on people of color,” according to Jann Carson, associate director and litigation coordinator of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon.

“We really are concerned about the rights of youth,” Carl Goodman, the county Department of Community Justice’s assistant director of adult services,  told The Oregonian. “But what corrections has to do is balance civil liberties with the risk of extreme violence.”

Traditional monitoring bracelets send alerts when an individual leaves a designated area. With GPS technology, officers can track a person wherever he or she goes. These monitoring systems typically consist of a GPS receiver/portable tracking device, radio frequency transmitter, stationary charging unit, cell phone and computer software to review GPS data.

Across the country, GPS tracking technology has been used to monitor various offenders, such as sex offenders and other high-profile parolees. California tracks sex offenders and gang members, San Antonio tracks high school truants, and a number of other state and local law enforcement agencies have been tracking offenders for the last five years or so.

But the technology is far from flawless. In many jurisdictions, false alarms have strained personnel and called the effectiveness of the tracking tool into question. In Arizona, a 2007 legislative study found more than 35,000 false alerts by 140 subjects wearing the GPS-monitoring devices. After numerous false alarms involving several subjects, Connecticut officials last year started pushing for a state-run monitoring facility to keep track of offenders being monitored by GPS.

“A lot of people think if you’re on GPS somebody is sitting at a computer and they know your whereabouts all the time,” Bill Carbone, executive director of the Connecticut Supreme Court Services, told Government Technology. “They’re not aware of the influence of weather and other interferences with the system and the cell tower issues.” 

In Multnomah, a judge needs to give authorities permission to track someone. Just as a bracelet could lead officers to a crime, Goodman said, the tool could also be used as evidence for a juvenile’s non-involvement. He also acknowledged that the program represents one piece of a broader crime-prevention strategy that includes a bike patrol to monitor gang hot spots and funding to support people who want to escape gang life.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Better security. Better government.
Powering security at all levels of government with simpler, more connected IT.
Cybersecurity in an "All-IP World" Are You Prepared?
In a recent survey conducted by Public CIO, over 125 respondents shared how they protect their environments from cyber threats and the challenges they see in an all-IP world. Read how your cybersecurity strategies and attitudes compare with your peers.
Maintain Your IT Budget with Consistent Compliance Practices
Between the demands of meeting federal IT compliance mandates, increasing cybersecurity threats, and ever-shrinking budgets, it’s not uncommon for routine maintenance tasks to slip among state and local government IT departments. If it’s been months, or even only days, since you have maintained your systems, your agency may not be prepared for a compliance audit—and that could have severe financial consequences. Regardless of your mission, consistent systems keep your data secure, your age
View All

Featured Papers