Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

At Issue: Open Data Is Cool, but Is it Sustainable?




Just another catch phrase for data on websites?

February 27, 2012 By

Open data may be cool, as some tech publications put it, but is it useful, sustainable, cost effective and all of that really practical stuff? After all, with an Internet full of data and information, how many people really are interested in machine-readable data sets of city or county expenditures, or the locations of public toilets, boat ramps, or building footprints? Isn't most of that stuff commercially available on the nearest mobile phone?

And isn't open data just the latest buzzword for something that government websites have been providing since the Web was commercialized back in the days of DOS? Isn't open data just the latest catch phrase for information on websites?

Most Americans heard of open data a few years ago when President Obama wanted to put all the stimulus finances online to avoid some of the problems that arise when tax money starts gushing into government programs that are opposed by the opposition -- and thus subject to intense scrutiny, spin and the making of political hay. 

And when Vivek Kundra, the then-CTO of Washington, D.C., decided to democratize data, he said -- in a 2009 GT article -- he did it for several reasons: "No. 1 was to drive transparency; No. 2 was to engage citizens; No. 3 was to ensure that we were lowering the cost of government operations." Kundra put hundreds of data sets onto the Washington, D.C., website so the general public could easily access real-time feeds -- in XML and other formats -- of everything governmental. The district also sponsored the Apps for Democracy contest, which gave prizes to contestants who integrated the data feeds into useful apps. New York City followed suit, and open data seemed like a big deal.

Recently however, the sustainability claims look a bit the worse for wear. Even though the federal government’s Data.gov expanded to include lots more government data, the fiscal plug was pulled when funding for the program was slashed significantly. So high priority it wasn't, or at least, one could say, the ROI was insufficient to weather the nation’s budget crisis. Of course, teachers, police officers, and many others suffered a similar fate, so the jury is still out on what really matters.

Kundra moved on from Washington, D.C., in 2009 to become the federal government’s CIO, and his successor in the District of Columbia announced that Apps for Democracy may be "more cool than useful" to citizens of the district, and so could be allowed to drop off the twig.

According to the Data.gov site -- which may be a bit out of date now -- 31 U.S. states and 15 U.S. cities maintain open data sites. Are they still "engaging citizens, driving transparency and ensuring we are lowering the cost of government operations" or are they doomed to fade off into the sunset like so many other cool ideas?

At Issue: Is open data still practical and sustainable, or has that door closed? Weigh in with examples -- GT is preparing a feature story and we would value your contributions. Send your data to Wayne Hanson.


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All