Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

At Issue: Why Oregon's Mileage Tax Doesn't Add Up (Opinion)



Low-emission vehicles would be penalized by Oregon's new vehicle mile tax system. iStockphoto

August 1, 2013 By

Oregon will run a voluntary vehicle miles traveled (VMT) taxation plan on 5,000 vehicles beginning in 2015. Here's how it will work:

You keep track of your mileage -- either by odometer or some kind of GPS meter. Oregon's gas tax is 30 cents per gallon which you will continue to pay, as well as 18.4 cents per gallon federal gas tax. However, when your mileage is computed and the tax calculated at 1.5 cents per mile, you can subtract the amount paid in Oregon gasoline tax. Save your receipts, please.

If you drive out of state or off road, then the mileage count ends. The thinking is that by 2015 a mobile GPS app will track non-taxed miles so those can also be subtracted from the total.

One reason for all the arithmetic is that nobody wants a state device installed in their car which tracks location. Oregon tried that back in 2006 but motorists objected. However, the state will need to verify mileage traveled somehow, either by checking odometers directly or having some kind of wireless reporting capability.

Ironically, electric vehicles will pay much more than they do now, and gas guzzlers will pay less, as they will pay 1.5 cents per mile instead of the former 30 cents per gallon. Big gas hogs could even get a refund.

So the system penalizes high-efficiency low-emission vehicles and rewards big vehicles with lousy mileage. With those backwards incentives, American streets may soon look like Havana, full of ancient cars that get 15 miles per gallon, predate pollution controls and thus don't require smog tests.

OK, assuming the technology works, and drivers put up with all the paperwork, all that adding and subtracting, verification, etc., does anyone believe that refunds will actually happen? Obviously clean air is not the object with VMT -- it's all about revenue, and if the pilot is successful, "voluntary" goes away and "mandatory" enters.  The next step is to raise the VMT from 1.5 cents to 2.5 or 3, etc.

If the public objects to the record-keeping and deducting and having to use some new tax preparation softare to figure out what they owe every three months, some legislator will come up with the bright idea of simplifying everything: "Let's just add the VMT to the 30 cents per gallon tax, and charge for out-of-state and off-road travel. That will solve the record-keeping complexity."

And thus the simplification leaves the state with two mobility taxes instead of one, an easier to understand tax scheme that penalizes everyone for daring to drive.

As the Duke of Wellington once said about his era's mode of transportation: "The railroad will only encourage the common people to move about needlessly." Of course he wasn't collecting railroad ticket tax.


| More

Comments

pockets    |    Commented August 6, 2013

Oregon is over thinking this and making it overly complicated. every year the cars get inspected and odometer is logged. use that existing system for the road use tax and ELIMINATE the gas tax. with Oregon taxing their registered vehicles and other states taxing theirs, it will all shake out to close enough to parity. otherwise, this is another level of government B.S. that will cost the tax payers more.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All