Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

Findings Released in California's Top-to-Bottom Voting System Review



July 27, 2007 By

Independent analysis teams, led by University of California computer science and cryptography experts Matthew Bishop and David Wagner, today released some of their findings in the technical examination phase of Secretary of State Debra Bowen's top-to-bottom review of voting systems certified for use in California.
 
"The top-to-bottom review is designed to look at the security, accuracy, reliability and accessibility of the voting systems certified for use in California in a way that's never been done before on a state or national level," said Bowen, the state's chief elections officer. "Every voter has the right to have his or her vote counted as it was cast, and voters want to know if the very tools of our democracy are secure, accurate, reliable and accessible. The goal of the review is to strengthen people's confidence in the integrity of our electoral process before California's 15.7 million registered voters are asked to go to the polls on February 5, 2008, and vote in the presidential primary election."
 
The independent UC reports, available on the Secretary of State's Web site, are the culmination of the UC teams' intensive two-month review of the hardware, software, documentation, source code and accessibility of three major voting systems:
  • Diebold GEMS 1.18.24/AccuVote
  • Hart Intercivic System 6.2.1
  • Sequoia WinEDS version 3.1.012/Edge/Insight/400-C
Five other currently certified voting systems were subject to examination under Bowen's top-to-bottom review. In four of those cases, vendors opted not to subject their systems to the top-to-bottom review because they don't intend to have any county use those systems in California elections after January 1, 2008. In the fifth case, the vendor declined to submit its system in time for the top-to-bottom review even though that system will be used in 2008. As Secretary Bowen noted in May, she has the authority to impose additional conditions on any system that has not yet gone through a top-to-bottom review.
 
A county-by-county list of voting systems used in the last statewide election is available online.
 
"The UC teams went through a thoughtful, methodical, analytical process in conducting their examinations of these systems. It is my intent to go through a similarly thoughtful, methodical and analytical process in determining what we do next," continued Bowen. "The next step in the process is the public hearing, when county elections officials, members of the public and the voting system vendors will provide their perspectives."
 
California law requires the Secretary of State to periodically review voting systems "to determine if they are defective, obsolete or otherwise unacceptable" and withdraw the approval previously granted for all or part of a voting system if it is subsequently found to be unacceptable. The Secretary of State also has the option of attaching additional conditions to a certification that could mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
 
To further inform the Secretary's certification decisions, a public hearing will be held on Monday, July 30, beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the auditorium of the Secretary of State's Sacramento headquarters. Written public comment is also welcome by email to votingsystems@sos.ca.gov or by mail to Secretary of State Debra Bowen, 1500 11th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, Attention: Voting Systems Review, 6th Floor.
 
After reviewing the independent UC reports, current state and local elections procedures and public comments on the findings, Bowen will issue certification decisions for the Diebold, Hart and Sequoia systems by August 3.
 


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All