Government Technology

High-Speed Rail Strategic Plan Released



April 16, 2009 By

Today President Barack Obama revealed a strategic plan to accelerate the development of high-speed rail across the country. He said high-speed rail is necessary to improve the environment and reduce traffic congestion and dependence on foreign oil.

In February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act allocated $13 billion for the development of high-speed rail. The Obama administration designated an additional $5 billion for it in the White House's proposed budget that will be disbursed in $1 billion increments over five years beginning with fiscal 2010.

The federal government classifies high-speed rail as trains between cities that travel at least 110 mph.

According to the Federal Railroad Administration press release, likely recipients of the funding are: California, the Pacific Northwest, south central, the Gulf Coast, the Chicago hub network, Florida, the southeast, Keystone, Empire and northern New England.

Obama wants state and local communities to create plans of 100- to 600-mile corridors, and the grants may be disbursed as early as late summer 2009.

Strategic Plan Outlines Three Funding Tracks

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the strategic plan identifies three funding tracks:

  • The individual projects track will provide grants to complete projects that have established the environmental and preliminary engineering work and emphasize near-term job creation. Eligible projects include acquisition, construction of or improvements to infrastructure, facilities and equipment.
  • The corridor programs track will fund the development of phases or geographic sections of high-speed rail corridors that have environmental documentation and a prioritized list of projects.
  • The planning track is intended to establish a structured mechanism and funding stream for future corridor development activities and will create agreements for planning activities -- like the development of state rail lines -- using nonstimulus money.

Funding Will Jump-Start Corridor Projects

In an interview with Reuters Financial Television, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said the stimulus money will jump-start high-speed rail, but that financing it nationally will cost significantly more.

Some states are hoping to obtain large grants, but they won't make much of a dent in the overall cost of building a rail system. According to the California High-Speed Rail Authority's Web site, the cost of connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles through an 800-mile system will cost approximately $45 billion.

"The cost of a high-speed train is $40 billion, and that's a lot of money," Mehdi Morshed, executive director of the California authority, told Government Technology in 2007. "But, over the same period of time that we're talking about building a high-speed train, California is going to spend more than $200 billion on highways and other transit modes in the state. Relative to all the other expenditures, it's not that huge of a change."

Eight Midwestern governors hope to obtain $3.4 billion of the funding to begin building the Chicago Hub Network. The group said the funds would cover Phase I, which would connect Chicago to St. Louis; Chicago to Milwaukee to Madison, Wis.; and Chicago to Detroit to Pontiac, Mich.

"I believe Missouri and the other states in our region present a compelling and united case to the Obama administration to fund these projects," said Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon in a statement on April 14. "Our states have been working on this rail initiative for more than a decade, and we will aggressively compete for these recovery act funds specifically designated for high-speed rail projects."

The next deadline for the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration is June 17, when information must be released regarding guidance on how the competitive grants will be evaluated.

A Green Initiative for Transportation


| More

Comments

CraigWV    |    Commented April 17, 2009

Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.

CraigWV    |    Commented April 17, 2009

Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.

CraigWV    |    Commented April 17, 2009

Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.

Rick    |    Commented January 27, 2013

France is smaller than Texas. Europe is not the US. Cost/square mile to replicate similar European service density would be staggering. It's comparing apples and oranges to put Paris in the US and extrapolate our needs.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Improving Emergency Response with Digital Communications
Saginaw County, Mich., increases interoperability, communication and collaboration with a digital voice and data network, as well as modern computer-aided dispatch.
Reduce Talk Time in Your Support Center by 40%
As the amount of information available to citizens and employees grows each year, so do customer expectations for efficient service. Contextual Knowledge makes information easy to find, dropping resolution times and skyrocketing satisfaction.
Emerging Technology Adoption in Local Government
In a recent survey conducted by Government Technology, 125 local government leaders shared their challenges, benefits and priorities when adopting emerging technologies such as cloud, mobility and IP. Read how your jurisdiction’s adoption of technology compares to your peers.
View All

Featured Papers