|
- Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Digital Communities
Industry Members
High-Speed Rail Strategic Plan Released
April 16, 2009 By Elaine Rundle
Today President Barack Obama revealed a strategic plan to accelerate the development of high-speed rail across the country. He said high-speed rail is necessary to improve the environment and reduce traffic congestion and dependence on foreign oil.
In February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act allocated $13 billion for the development of high-speed rail. The Obama administration designated an additional $5 billion for it in the White House's proposed budget that will be disbursed in $1 billion increments over five years beginning with fiscal 2010.
The federal government classifies high-speed rail as trains between cities that travel at least 110 mph.
According to the Federal Railroad Administration press release, likely recipients of the funding are: California, the Pacific Northwest, south central, the Gulf Coast, the Chicago hub network, Florida, the southeast, Keystone, Empire and northern New England.
Obama wants state and local communities to create plans of 100- to 600-mile corridors, and the grants may be disbursed as early as late summer 2009.
Strategic Plan Outlines Three Funding Tracks
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the strategic plan identifies three funding tracks:
- The individual projects track will provide grants to complete projects that have established the environmental and preliminary engineering work and emphasize near-term job creation. Eligible projects include acquisition, construction of or improvements to infrastructure, facilities and equipment.
- The corridor programs track will fund the development of phases or geographic sections of high-speed rail corridors that have environmental documentation and a prioritized list of projects.
- The planning track is intended to establish a structured mechanism and funding stream for future corridor development activities and will create agreements for planning activities -- like the development of state rail lines -- using nonstimulus money.
Funding Will Jump-Start Corridor Projects
In an interview with Reuters Financial Television, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said the stimulus money will jump-start high-speed rail, but that financing it nationally will cost significantly more.
Some states are hoping to obtain large grants, but they won't make much of a dent in the overall cost of building a rail system. According to the California High-Speed Rail Authority's Web site, the cost of connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles through an 800-mile system will cost approximately $45 billion.
"The cost of a high-speed train is $40 billion, and that's a lot of money," Mehdi Morshed, executive director of the California authority, told Government Technology in 2007. "But, over the same period of time that we're talking about building a high-speed train, California is going to spend more than $200 billion on highways and other transit modes in the state. Relative to all the other expenditures, it's not that huge of a change."
Eight Midwestern governors hope to obtain $3.4 billion of the funding to begin building the Chicago Hub Network. The group said the funds would cover Phase I, which would connect Chicago to St. Louis; Chicago to Milwaukee to Madison, Wis.; and Chicago to Detroit to Pontiac, Mich.
"I believe Missouri and the other states in our region present a compelling and united case to the Obama administration to fund these projects," said Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon in a statement on April 14. "Our states have been working on this rail initiative for more than a decade, and we will aggressively compete for these recovery act funds specifically designated for high-speed rail projects."
The next deadline for the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration is June 17, when information must be released regarding guidance on how the competitive grants will be evaluated.
A Green Initiative for Transportation
In Our Library
- Mobile Capture - taking the first step
- Download this whitepaper and learn how to reduce costs and improve the value of services to compete effectively. This insightful use case demonstrates the benefits of providing branch employees, field representatives and customers with the ability to capture application forms and supporting documents with a mobile phone or tablet, and immediately have them validated and fed directly into the back office process.
- Hurricane Preparedness
- Make sure you are prepared for hurricane season before it is here. Join in this Digital Communities teleconference and gain insight on how to prepare from experts who have been on the ground during major hurricanes.
- Government-to-Government IT Services: What Works and What's Left to Work Out
- This paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption. View All
Subscribe to Digital Communities
Digital Communities (DC) is e.Republic‘s local government program. The particular strength of DC is its focus on encouraging collaboration and creating productive relationships between and among cities, counties, regions and select private sector companies uniquely positioned to help improve the delivery of public services.
Subscribe | View Digital Issue
Government Best Practices
Featured White Papers & Reports
Government-to-Government IT Services: What Works and What's Left to Work OutThis Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.
View Full Library
Events
Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.
Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.
Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.
Having just returned from a week in Paris, my wife and I were amazed at the quality and efficiency of France's rail service, including the Paris metro, the regional rail lines (RER), and Eurostar (the "Chunnel" to London). The Paris traffic is scary enough (Smart Cars are in vogue), so I can't imagine if all the people who rode the trains were instead on the roads and streets. We were able to get anywhere we wanted to quickly at a reasonable cost. And as a side benefit we got some much needed exercise from walking to the metro stations and up and down the metro entrance steps. It is a national disgrace that the US has let its railroad system deteriorate to its present nadir. The false pretense of uninhhibited "personal freedom" and the car culture of the last 100 years are starting to catch up with us. In my opinion two lanes of every interstate should be converted to a high speed rail corridor ASAP. While that may be a dream (or is it?), I fear it may be too late as much of the rail infrastructure of earlier last century has been removed or built over. Talk of "mass transportation" and "intermodal transportation" (let's not forget bus travel either) in an American context rings hollow. If we don't have the expertise or will power to change things ourselves, then we should recruit the experts from Europe and Japan to help get the job done. With the current decay of the airline industry as well, Americans need a third major alternative in how they choose to travel. The option of affordable and near-universal rail service to the American populace should not have been allowed to disappear in the first place.
France is smaller than Texas. Europe is not the US. Cost/square mile to replicate similar European service density would be staggering. It's comparing apples and oranges to put Paris in the US and extrapolate our needs.