Government Technology

    Digital Communities
    Industry Members

  • Click sponsor logos for whitepapers, case studies, and best practices.
  • McAfee

How Will Boston Modernize City Fire Alarms?



January 15, 2013 By

The city of Boston is interested in modernizing its fire alarm boxes, but how the city does that will be determined by which vendor submits the best idea.

The city, in conjunction with the Boston Fire Department, released a request for information for ideas on how the city can upgrade its current fire alarm system using new technologies. Boston is only soliciting ideas from private vendors “who are able to physically modify and upgrade the current fire alarm boxes.” Submissions are due Feb. 22.

Justin Brown, the Fire Department’s deputy commissioner, said the city’s existing 2,200 street-corner fire alarms operate on an electric telegraph system, connected through miles of low-voltage copper wire running in loops. When someone pulls the lever on a fire alarm, a telegraph signal is sent to both the Fire Department’s communications center, known as the Fire Alarm Office, and the local fire house.

But Brown said that because fire alarms only create one-way communication, the city wants to explore new ways to possibly expand beyond a single message from fire alarm boxes to the Fire Department.

“We’re interested in having multiple communication types and really enhancing the ability to send more specific messages so that we can use them for both emergency and non-emergency purposes, but also get more specific messages,” Brown said. “Is this actually a fire? Is this a law enforcement call? Do you need medical assistance? And maybe be able to communicate back and forth.”

According to Boston CIO Bill Oates, the RFI is intentionally not too descriptive so that the city can gather a whole range of ideas.

“Lots of people have ideas, but we really felt that before we started to hone in on anything in particular, we would go out and see what other ideas folks might have on this,” Oates said.

One of the more pressing concerns for the Fire Department, according to Brown, is the amount of money spent maintaining the existing fire alarm system. Because the system is expensive to maintain, particularly when fire alarms need to be replaced, Brown said the Fire Department would like to get more value from its investment.

Another major reason for the upgrade is the frequency of false alarms with the current system. Every time an alarm is pulled, it must be manually reset. According to Brown, between January and September of last year, each of the city’s three busiest alarm boxes were pulled 10 times. Every one of those instances was a false alarm. Throughout the year, the Fire Department deals with false alarms roughly 90 percent of the time.

The Fire Department hopes that modernized technology in the fire alarm boxes will reduce the number of false alarms.

“One of our goals is to reduce the false alarms, and one of our goals is to provide the community with a better way to contact us and a better service that meets their needs better than just pulling a box and waiting for several fire trucks to show up,” Brown said.

 


| More

Comments

Barry Oakley    |    Commented January 16, 2013

The City of Boston does not have 22,000 fire alarm boxes on the street it's approximately 2,200 and when the box is pulled it only goes to Fire Alarm it does not go the fire houses.Fire Alarm then dispatches to appropriate Fire companies.

tony    |    Commented January 17, 2013

Before they spend money on a new call box system, they should study to see if the actual emergency calls were first reported by phone (cell or land line) or the present call box system. Call boxes on the street may be a thing of the past now that cell phones are almost everywhere. The only way to discourage a false alarm from a call box is to have to put your hand and are through a device that holds you there until the responders arrive.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Digital Cities & Counties Survey: Best Practices Quick Reference Guide
This Best Practices Quick Reference Guide is a compilation of examples from the 2013 Digital Cities and Counties Surveys showcasing the innovative ways local governments are using technological tools to respond to the needs of their communities. It is our hope that by calling attention to just a few examples from cities and counties of all sizes, we will encourage further collaboration and spark additional creativity in local government service delivery.
Wireless Reporting Takes Pain (& Wait) out of Voting
In Michigan and Minnesota counties, wireless voting via the AT&T network has brought speed, efficiency and accuracy to elections - another illustration of how mobility and machine-to-machine (M2M) technology help governments to bring superior services and communication to constituents.
Why Would a City Proclaim Their Data “Open by Default?”
The City of Palo Alto, California, a 2013 Center for Digital Government Digital City Survey winner, has officially proclaimed “open” to be the default setting for all city data. Are they courageous or crazy?
View All