April 17, 2009 By Andy Opsahl
Money for transportation projects has been some of the earliest to flow from the U.S. economic stimulus package. Municipalities in Bucks County, Penn.; Philadelphia; Flint, Mich.; and others are using some of the money for intelligent transportation systems (ITS), a class of products that includes changeable electronic message boards, pavement sensors and cameras that help synchronize traffic.
In one such project, St. Cloud, Minn., is funding a traffic-monitoring software upgrade. The project received $320,000. Attaining the money was easy for St. Cloud because of the "joint powers agreement" it shares with its county and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), which received stimulus money from the Federal Highway Administration, said Blake Redfield, traffic systems manager of St. Cloud.
All three entities own traffic signals within St. Cloud, so they share access and control of the system that regulates the lights, provided by vendor Econolite International. The fact that it was an intelligent traffic system made it an easier draw for stimulus funding, Redfield said.
"In Minnesota, there just aren't a lot of cities doing a tremendous amount of ITS types of projects, especially communities our size of around 100,000 people," Redfield explained. The fact that Mn/DOT wanted funding to go for a diverse collection of projects made the St. Cloud ITS procurement an even likelier candidate for stimulus funding. Software like this usually comes with annual maintenance service costs from the vendor. The agencies are exploring whether it would be legal to use some of the stimulus to pay for five years of that service upfront, according to Mn/DOT District Traffic Engineer Tom Dumont.
President Barack Obama heralded funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as a way to stimulate job growth. Purchases like St. Cloud's traffic-monitoring software raise a question: Are state and local stimulus recipients stimulating job growth or simply paying bills already planned for with stimulus money instead of state-generated money?
Dumont pointed out that the stimulus money accelerated deployment of the traffic-monitoring software, which could have helped save jobs.
But Redfield said the three agencies involved planned to update the traffic-management software anyway during the next several months because the vendor announced it would stop providing maintenance service for the existing software in 2011.
"It was [a matter of], 'Do we continue the maintenance contract on the old system that we know isn't going to be supported in a couple years, or do we upgrade the system right now?'" Dumont explained.
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.
Don't miss this opportunity to see the latest in digital government solutions, keep abreast of current policy issues and network with key government executives, technologists and industry specialists.
This article came to my attention today and I would like to correct a statement that is absolutely false regarding Econolite's plans to continue support of a product referred to in this article. The article stated "the vendor announced it would stop providing maintenance service for the existing software in 2011." While Econolite has introduced a new product that we are very proud of, we have not made any announcements of the sort mentioned in this article. We will continue to stand by and support our icons product.
This article came to my attention today and I would like to correct a statement that is absolutely false regarding Econolite's plans to continue support of a product referred to in this article. The article stated "the vendor announced it would stop providing maintenance service for the existing software in 2011." While Econolite has introduced a new product that we are very proud of, we have not made any announcements of the sort mentioned in this article. We will continue to stand by and support our icons product.
This article came to my attention today and I would like to correct a statement that is absolutely false regarding Econolite's plans to continue support of a product referred to in this article. The article stated "the vendor announced it would stop providing maintenance service for the existing software in 2011." While Econolite has introduced a new product that we are very proud of, we have not made any announcements of the sort mentioned in this article. We will continue to stand by and support our icons product.