January 27, 2010 By Casey Mayville
Today the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) released a report, Explaining International IT Application Leadership: Intelligent Transportation Systems, and will hold a forum for domestic and international transportation experts to discuss the implications of the findings.
The report highlights the increasing disparity between foreign industrialized nations and the United States regarding the current use of new technologies to address major transportation congestion, safety and environmental problems.
"The report should be a serious wake-up call to our nation's transportation leaders and policymakers as to why the U.S. is not staying competitive in the international market," said Scott Belcher, president and CEO of the Intelligent Transportation Society (ITS) of America. "Other industrialized nations have learned that a major key to transportation efficiency and economic growth is developing intelligent transportation systems to allow for the safe and easy movement of goods and people."
Improving a nation's transportation system involves more than building new roads and repairing old infrastructure. The future of transportation includes networks of sensors, microchips, cameras, vehicle probes and devices to disseminate information in real time to the masses.
Here are a few of the countries that are leading the way in ITS development and some of their strengths:
Other countries making significant advances in ITS are Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and the United Kingdom. While the limited land mass of each of these countries has played a major role in making transportation efficiency a top priority, policy factors appear much more important in explaining international leadership in ITS. The countries listed above all have clear and comprehensive nationwide visions for what ITS should look like in their respective countries.
To be sure, the United States is not completely lacking in the area of ITS and has many pockets of strength in different regions and cities across the nation. However, the U.S. does not have a national ITS vision and lacks federal-level funding. While states have their own ideas of efficient traffic systems, a federally led approach needs to be put in place to help with reorganization.
This Digital Communities white paper highlights discussions with IT officials in four counties that have adopted shared services models. Our aim was to learn about the obstacles these governments have faced when it comes to shared services and what it takes to overcome those roadblocks. We also spoke with several members of the IT industry who have thought long and hard about these issues. The paper offers some best practices for shared government-to-government services, but also points out challenges that government and industry still must overcome before this model gains widespread adoption.