Government Technology

Measure Would Penalize Fuel-Efficient Vehicles



December 26, 2007 By

After years of incentives to use less gasoline and drive more fuel-efficient vehicles -- the most effective of which may be $3+ per-gallon gasoline -- the National Governor's Association and others have come up with a way to reverse the incentives and penalize drivers who use less fuel while traveling the same amount of miles. Actually, that's not the stated intent of the measure, but it's what could happen if "tax by mile driven" measures become law. You see, fuel-efficient vehicles and ethanol are cutting into state tax revenues. So as we get green -- beginning to solve one set of problems -- the tax authorities see another problem looming -- less gas tax revenues. So they are backing a plan to tax for miles driven in addition to gasoline purchased.

What this means is that a motorcyclist or hybrid driver who gets 60 miles per gallon of fuel and commutes 60 miles per day, will pay the same amount of mileage tax as a guy driving a Cadillac Escalade or Nissan Titan 60 miles per day and getting 15 or 20 miles per gallon. So the two drivers would pay the same amount per gallon of gas, but the mileage tax incentives favor the bigger vehicle.

But there's an important question here: If the "miles driven," tax is implemented, will the gas tax disappear? Doubtful. So another way to tax the motorist arrives atop the old way. Perhaps the politicians hope that Prius drivers and Hummer owners will be arguing with each other and miss the fact that another tax has just been levied on transportation.

And there's another bad idea that merges into this traffic taxation lane. In order to do the mileage tax, motorists would need to install GPS monitoring equipment in their vehicles to keep tabs on how many miles they travel. Similar location-based systems -- called congestion pricing -- are now being tested in cities around the world. The closer the vehicle goes to the center of the city, the higher the toll paid by the vehicle owner. So instead of anonymous travel, the freedom of the road, and "hey I've got a tiny uncomfortable car so I'm greener than you," you have the government calculating how many miles you drive and sending you a bill. And knowing where you are, and how fast you're driving and where you stopped for the night and what route you take to work, etc. Everyone with a vehicle will effectively be wearing an ankle bracelet just like those guys on parole.

Along with the red-light cameras, RFID tags for toll roads and GPS-enabled cell phones, every motorist in America could be located on some Internet map. Sure there would be benefits to the public and to government, but at the bottom of all this beneficial technology is the key question: "How can we extract more cash from the public?"

Vehicles do need roads, and somebody has to pay for them. It sounds logical that the more miles you drive, the more you should support the infrastructure. However, a Prius and a motorcycle don't tear up the roads. Heavy trucks do. Escalades with six overweight car pool riders do -- OK, so that's going too far. But penalizing green vehicles while building an infrastructure to track and tax every vehicle in the country is a very bad idea.


| More

Comments

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

So which governor's want to have this tax. Everyone should write their governors and protest this absurd tax. The State's are already getting rich from the huge taxes being collected due to the high cost of fuel.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

So which governor's want to have this tax. Everyone should write their governors and protest this absurd tax. The State's are already getting rich from the huge taxes being collected due to the high cost of fuel.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

So which governor's want to have this tax. Everyone should write their governors and protest this absurd tax. The State's are already getting rich from the huge taxes being collected due to the high cost of fuel.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

High gas prices do not increase taxes to the governments, the taxes are based on gallons so the higher prices tend to reduce usage and reduce the taxes for road maintenance.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

High gas prices do not increase taxes to the governments, the taxes are based on gallons so the higher prices tend to reduce usage and reduce the taxes for road maintenance.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 3, 2008

High gas prices do not increase taxes to the governments, the taxes are based on gallons so the higher prices tend to reduce usage and reduce the taxes for road maintenance.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 4, 2010

Well, I pay sales tax on gasoline purchases so it isn't "by gallons only"

Anonymous    |    Commented January 4, 2010

Well, I pay sales tax on gasoline purchases so it isn't "by gallons only"

Anonymous    |    Commented January 4, 2010

Well, I pay sales tax on gasoline purchases so it isn't "by gallons only"

Anonymous    |    Commented January 5, 2010

To assume states are getting rich with gas taxes is absurd. The "Road Fund" in West Virginia makes up less than 8% of the total budget... comprisied mainly of gasoline sales tax. This amount continues to shrink each year, 8 years ago the amount was 12%. While I don't support a mileage tax...other options must be explored.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 5, 2010

To assume states are getting rich with gas taxes is absurd. The "Road Fund" in West Virginia makes up less than 8% of the total budget... comprisied mainly of gasoline sales tax. This amount continues to shrink each year, 8 years ago the amount was 12%. While I don't support a mileage tax...other options must be explored.

Anonymous    |    Commented January 5, 2010

To assume states are getting rich with gas taxes is absurd. The "Road Fund" in West Virginia makes up less than 8% of the total budget... comprisied mainly of gasoline sales tax. This amount continues to shrink each year, 8 years ago the amount was 12%. While I don't support a mileage tax...other options must be explored.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Best Practice Guide for Cloud and As-A-Service Procurements
While technology service options for government continue to evolve, procurement processes and policies have remained firmly rooted in practices that are no longer effective. This guide, built upon the collaborative work of state and local government and industry executives, outlines and explains the changes needed for more flexible and agile procurement processes.
Fresh Ideas In Online Security for Public Safety Organizations
Lesley Carhart, Senior Information Security Specialist at Motorola Solutions, knows that online and computer security are more challenging than ever. Personal smartphones, removable devices like USB storage drives, and social media have a significant impact on security. In “Fresh Ideas in Online Security for Public Safely Organizations,” Lesley provides recommendations to improve your online security against threats from social networks, removable devices, weak passwords and digital photos.
Meeting Constituents Where They Are With Dynamic, Real-Time Mobile Engagement
Leveraging the proven and open Kofax Mobile Capture Platform, organizations can rapidly integrate powerful mobile engagement solutions across the spectrum of mobile image capture, mobile data capture and complete mobile process integration. Kofax differentiates itself by extending capture to mobility, supporting multiple points of constituent engagement. Kofax solutions dynamically orchestrate the user’s mobile experience from a single platform—reducing time to market, improving process perf
View All

Featured Papers