Government Technology

Performance Measurement: Are CIOs Aiming for the Right Result? (Opinion)



June 9, 2009 By

I used to work with a manager named Smitty who had a dartboard in his office. Smitty was fond of saying that there wasn't a management issue that couldn't be resolved over a good game of 301. If you heard the distinctive thud of darts hitting the old board, you knew Smitty was hard at work sharing his insights with younger employees, making budget decisions or debating the merit of new programs.

Darts was more than a pastime; for him, it was a style of management. Stand as close to the situation as possible, use your years of experience to gauge your shot, and throw into the general area. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you miss, but you always have two more tries and you usually get close enough that the wall isn't covered in holes.

Even after years of working with Smitty, I always was frustrated that the difference between triple 20 and 2 was a metal bar thinner than your car key. Too often I was on the wrong side of that bar. If you are not a dart player, triple 20 is actually the bull's-eye. It's worth more than the red dot in the center in most games. Inexperienced players shoot for the middle, but you know you're around a dart player when they go after the triple 20. In IT management, it's like when application developers track the number of lines of code as a performance measure. Increasing the number of lines is not shooting for the real goal.

Performance management is more like artillery fire than darts and it's a better way to lead. With artillery, there are coordinates and weather factors you enter in, carefully aim, fire, and adjust the cannon to get to your mark with the next shot. It's a repeatable cycle proven to get results and remove some of the human error you get in things like darts.

In performance management the cycle is: Measure performance, set goals, make improvements to hit those goals and measure performance to see if you met them. Lather, rinse, repeat. The cycle serves as the basis for how improvement is made and should be in the DNA of a well managed organization.


View Full Story


| More

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

In Our Library

White Papers | Exclusives Reports | Webinar Archives | Best Practices and Case Studies
Improving Emergency Response with Digital Communications
Saginaw County, Mich., increases interoperability, communication and collaboration with a digital voice and data network, as well as modern computer-aided dispatch.
Reduce Talk Time in Your Support Center by 40%
As the amount of information available to citizens and employees grows each year, so do customer expectations for efficient service. Contextual Knowledge makes information easy to find, dropping resolution times and skyrocketing satisfaction.
Emerging Technology Adoption in Local Government
In a recent survey conducted by Government Technology, 125 local government leaders shared their challenges, benefits and priorities when adopting emerging technologies such as cloud, mobility and IP. Read how your jurisdiction’s adoption of technology compares to your peers.
View All

Featured Papers